EFTA00104590Set 9
2020-07-291p183w
Ghislaine
Maxwell's lawyers made in a filing to Judge Preska today in the Guiffre v.
Maxwell case 15-cv-7433, document 1078, in which she questions how
prosecutors ... case which was supposed
to be under seal.
She further alleges that Guiffre's lawyers, working with the government,
set a "perjury trap" for her when Guiffre took Maxwell
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104590.pdf
EFTA00091277Set 9
2019-04-092p269w
have any trouble accessing these. Best, Sigrid
BSF SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENA
Guiffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), S.D.N.Y.
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Sealed Order
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091277.pdf
EFTA00623075Set 9
2016-06-0140p11,688w
agreement, it is clear that the referenced communications involving Scarola are protected. See,
e.g., Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 15 CIV. 7433 (RWS), 2016 WL 1756918, at *6 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00623075.pdf