EFTA00846636Set 9
2015-09-102p456w
When I was researching my article about Dennis Hastert's indictment on charges that he improperly withdrew
large sums of money from a bank, one question I had was whether ... owed on the payments Mr.
Hastert was said to have made.
For tax purposes, were the payments gifts? Fees? A settlement? Hush money? Any of these options would have ... either case, the
responsibility for reporting the payments would lie not with Mr. Hastert but with the payments' recipient,
identified in the indictment as "Individual A."
"The legal requirement
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00846636.pdf
EFTA02355359Set 11
2015-06-092p299w
evacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
<=iv>
i assume you mean reid and not hastert?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7=45 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <
wrote:<=r>
Now that would have ... jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com»
wrote:
hastert should have married indvidual=A so that the spouse exception would apply to testimony.
&=bsp; how are you feeling?
=div>
please note
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02355359.pdf
EFTA02711699Set 11
2015-06-092p283w
Kathy Ruemmler
Subject: Re:
i assume you mean reid and not hastert?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:4= AM, Kathy Ruemmler
wrote:<=r>
Now that would hav= been ... jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om> wrote:
hastert should have married i=dvidual A so that the spouse exception would apply to testimon=. how are you
feeling?
=lease note
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02711699.pdf