EFTA01106843Set 9
2013-06-1717p7,366w
appropriate construction of
§ 707(b)(3) in conjunction with § 267(c) is bolstered by Hickman v. Commissioner. T.C.
Memo. 1972-208.
In Hickman, the narrow issue before the court ... value of Atlas
Groves, Inc., all of whose stock was owned by the Mary Hickman Trust (trust), and (2)
whether the method of valuing ownership of stock was computed "within ... intendment of the provision in conjunction with § 267(c) and the relevant facts. See
Hickman.
We believe that to apply the § 267(c) rules in the instant case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01106843.pdf
EFTA00209657Set 9
2013-08-0575p16,720w
Power Supply, Inc.,
332 F.3d 976, 980 (6th Cir. 2003) 32,33, 38,40
Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947) 14, 20, 21
Holt-Orsted v. City of Dickson ... district court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to do precisely what
Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage attorneys to do:
reduce facts ... anticipation of litigation,"' United
States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 237-38 (1975), quoting Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S.
495, 508 (1947), which applies in both civil and criminal litigation
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209657.pdf
EFTA01072194Set 9
2013-06-1858p13,073w
district court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to
do precisely what Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to
encourage attorneys to do: reduce facts ... anticipation of
litigation,'" United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 237-38 (1975), quoting
Hickman v. Taylor, 429 U.S. 495, 508 (1947), which applies in both civil and
criminal litigation ... presentation of each side of the case.
Nobles, 422 U.S. at 238. In Hickman, the Court described the policy which dictates
that opinion work product of attorneys be protected from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01072194.pdf
EFTA01134321Set 9
2013-06-1858p13,086w
district court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to
do precisely what Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to
encourage attorneys to do: reduce facts ... anticipation of
litigation,'" United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 237-38 (1975), quoting
Hickman v. Taylor, 429 U.S. 495, 508 (1947), which applies in both civil and
criminal litigation ... presentation of each side of the case.
Nobles, 422 U.S. at 238. In Hickman, the Court described the policy which dictates
that opinion work product of attorneys be protected from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01134321.pdf
EFTA01657752Set 10
2015-07-0651p13,321w
certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by
opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The
privilege is codified at Federal Rule ... attorney-client privilege." United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 238
(1975) (citing Hickman 329 U.S. at 508). In fact, the Eighth Circuit went on to consider the
application
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01657752.pdf
EFTA02335898Set 11
2015-07-0651p13,383w
certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by
opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The
privilege is codified at Federal Rule ... attorney-client privilege." United States v. Nobles 422 U.S. 225, 238
(1975) (citing Hickman 329 U.S. at 508). In fact, the Eighth Circuit went on to consider the
application
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335898.pdf
EFTA01072032Set 9
2013-07-1242p9,971w
Gulfstream Park Racing Ass 'n, Inc., 399 F.3d 391
(1st Cir. 2005) 17
Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947) 9
In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F.Supp ... district court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to do precisely what
Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage attorneys to do:
reduce facts
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01072032.pdf
EFTA01200390Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,320w
certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by
opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The
privilege is codified at Federal Rule ... attorney-client privilege." United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 238
(1975) (citing Hickman 329 U.S. at 508). In fact, the Eighth Circuit went on to consider the
application
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01200390.pdf
EFTA01206431Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,321w
certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by
opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The
privilege is codified at Federal Rule ... attorney-client privilege." United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 238
(1975) (citing Hickman 329 U.S. at 508). In fact, the Eighth Circuit went on to consider the
application
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01206431.pdf
EFTA01180323Set 9
2014-04-2446p10,094w
Rubber Co. v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc.,
332 F.3d 976 (eh Cir. 2003) passim
Hickman v. Taylor,
329 U.S. 495 (1947) 14
EFTA01180327
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/24/2014 Page ... function than if it had been spoken and privileged." Id.
at 12. See also Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510-511 (1947) (recognizing that if
an attorney's work
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01180323.pdf
EFTA00210140Set 9
2015-07-0651p13,318w
certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by
opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman I. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The
privilege is codified at Federal Rule ... attorney-client privilege." United States I. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 238
(1975) (citing Hickman 329 U.S. at 508). In fact, the Eighth Circuit went on to consider the
application
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210140.pdf
EFTA00073051Set 9
2019-10-1119p6,737w
Cooke July 12, 2007
21. Commonwealth of Kentucky v Quincy Omar Cross
Hickman Circuit
Clinton, KY, Case#08-CR-00001 April 2, 2008
22. Blau v. Schaefer, MD (Docket
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00073051.pdf
EFTA00221210Set 9
2008-09-1012p2,938w
discovery should be afforded broad and liberal
treatment to effectuate their purpose), citing, Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495,
501, 507 (1947).
15. Next, the right to go to court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221210.pdf