carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account Holder/UBO contradicted by. or inconsistent with,
information previously provided by the Account Holder/UBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g. domicile. residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change having been provided to DB?
If, after considering the factors ... aware). the RM / IA has
reason to believe the Account Holder/UBO could be engaged in tax evasion, the RM / IA should not provide the
confirmation below and should instead raise
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01345258.pdf
EFTA01298644Set 10
4p1,557w
carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account Holder/UBO contradicted by, or Inconsistent with,
information previously provided by the Account Holder/UBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g. domicile. residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change having been provided to DB?
If, after considering the factors ... aware), the RM / IA has
reason to believe the Account Holder/UBO could be engaged in tax evasion, the RM / IA should not provide the
confirmation below and should instead raise
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01298644.pdf
carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account
Holder/UBO contradicted by, or inconsistent with,
information previously provided by the Account Holder/UBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g.
domicile, residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change
having been provided to DB?
If, after considering the factors ... aware), the RM / IA has
reason to believe the Account Holder/UBO could be engaged in tax evasion,
the RM / IA should not provide the
confirmation below and should instead raise
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01478399.pdf
carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account Holder/UBO contradicted by, or inconsistent with.
information previously provided by the Account Holder/UBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g. domicile, residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change having been provided to DB?
If. after considering the factors
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01377441.pdf
carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account Holder/UBO contradicted by, or inconsistent with.
information previously provided by the Account Holder/UBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g. domicile, residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change having been provided to DB?
If. after considering the factors
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01460277.pdf
carefully considered:
1. Was any information in the Self-Certification provided by the Account Holder/UBO contradicted by. or inconsistent with,
information previously provided by the Account HolderlUBO ... recent change in personal circumstances (e.g. domicile, residence, nationality) of the
Account Holder/UBO without supporting documentation to verify the change having been provided to OB?
If, after considering the factors ... aware), the RM / IA has
reason to believe the Account Holder/UBO could be engaged in tax evasion, the RM / IA should not provide the
confirmation below and should instead raise
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01357088.pdf