need to be there.
(A-18:10-11).2
This fact alone distinguishes Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d at 668. There, the
judge, before sentencing, had reviewed the documents in question ... Second District
held it did not because "[i]t is clear that Judge Holtzendorf considered the
psychological report and letters in making his sentencing decision." Id.
Interestingly, the Second District