""I. Determine"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"I. Determine"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00792343Set 9

Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT 16 I. THE COURT'S LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA ... Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear ... Appellant's Federal Due Process Rights. 32 H. THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS. 36 A. The Court Improperly Assessed Points Against Appellant for Conduct That

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792343.pdf

EFTA01090709Set 9

APPEAR 3.130. FIRST APPEARANCE 3.131. PRETRIAL RELEASE 3.132. PRETRIAL DETENTION 3.133. PRETRIAL PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATIONS AND ADVERSARY PRELIMINARY HEARINGS 3.134. TIME FOR FILING FORMAL CHARGES 3.140. INDICTMENTS; INFORMATIONS EFTA01090713 ... MEMBER 3.310. TIME FOR CHALLENGE 3.315. EXERCISE OF CHALLENGES 3.320. MANNER OF CHALLENGE 3.330. DETERMINATION OF CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE 3.340. EFFECT OF SUSTAINING CHALLENGE 3.350. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES 3.360. OATH ... POLLING THE JURY 3.451. JUDICIAL COMMENT ON VERDICT 3.470. PROCEEDINGS ON SEALED VERDICT 3.490. DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF OFFENSE 3.500. VERDICT OF GUILTY WHERE MORE THAN ONE COUNT 3.505. INCONSISTENT

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01090709.pdf

EFTA01723652Set 10

2008-07-10100p21,667w

enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that ... enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that ... enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01723652.pdf

EFTA00194605Set 9

2007-09-1382p20,678w

advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines will be determined by the Court relying in part on the results of a Pre-Sentence Investigation ... aware and understands that the Court is required to consider the advisory guideline range determined under the Sentencing Guidelines, but is not bound to impose that sentence; the Court ... defendant understands that the amount of restitution owed to each victim will be determined at or before sentencing. 6. The defendant agrees that, if any of the victims identified

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00194605.pdf

EFTA00804385Set 9removed from DOJ

2011-10-2673p27,731w

CONTENTS Policy Specifications Page No. Paps Na Psifit 1. - The Basics Of Thls Policy Determining Amount Of Premium The Parties Involved • Owner, Insureds, Needed To Avoid Termination 12 Beneficiary, Irrevocable ... Date and Guaranteed Death Benefit Guarantee Period End Date, we were unable to determine premium amounts that would guarantee your policy will not lapse based on the guarantee period ... younger Insured are 1.00. These Death Benefit Factors are used to determine the amount of the minimum death benefit. For more information, see Part 6 of this policy. POLICY SPECIFICATIONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00804385.pdf

EFTA01118290Set 9

broker/dealer quotes, arms-length independent third party quotes or external independent pricing sources as determined [by the Counterparty][the mutual agreement of the Counterparty and Cascade]. Marketable securities shall mean ... principal securities exchange on which they are traded on the date of determination, or, if no sales occurred on such date, the mean between the closing "bid" and "asked" prices ... their settlement prices on the day as of which the value is being determined; provided, however, that, if a futures or option contract could not be liquidated on such

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01118290.pdf

EFTA00124742Set 9

2019-02-0832p17,251w

Donor amount The dcdar emelt of the suspected error moth; it is determined by addng a Margin to the U.S. Prime Rate pubished in the Wad • Description of problem ... amount believe is wrong and why you believe t is a mistake. that we determine based on an evaluation cf your credit history. You must contact us within 60 days ... that are marked with any other nettle/he you interest on that amount. But, line determine that we made a riVtake, you will not endorsements, should be sent

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00124742.pdf

EFTA00598083Set 9

2006-04-2419p13,662w

FedCl 782. Code Sec. 501I Exempt organhations: Exempt status: Charitable purpose.— The IRS properly determined that a California corporation that administered a donor advised fund did not qualify ... held that de nova was the correct standard—is was for the court to determine whether the organization was entitled to exemption. This standard nxre closely tracts the statutory language ... legislative history. Thus. the court was not required to review the IRS's determination directly. but rather compelled it to make a declaration as to the qualification itself. The court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598083.pdf

EFTA00583425Set 9

2011-09-1323p10,171w

equal the sum of (i) the redemption price for the CCP LP Interests as determined by an independent appraiser (the "Appraiser") in the manner provided in Section 3.3 below ... Price") plus (ii) the redemption price for the CCP LP Interests as determined by the Appraiser in the manner provided in Section 3.3 below (the "CCPM LLC Price ... Epstein. By way of illustration only: (1) if the CCP LP Price is determined by the Appraiser to be $1,000,000 and the CCPM LLC Price is determined

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583425.pdf

EFTA00585905Set 9

2014-09-0826p9,541w

funding the Company Expenses (as hereinafter defined) and for such other Company purposes as determined by the Members. Each request by the Company for an Additional Capital Contribution pursuant ... received by the Company shall be utilized by the Company for Company purposes as determined by the Members. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, no interest shall accrue ... basis coverage for at least the current fair market value of the Property as determined by the most recent Annual Appraisal or Qualified Appraisal (each as hereinafter defined) (the "Current

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00585905.pdf

EFTA01295633Set 10

2015-10-01135p75,076w

order and there were no new facts or legal precedent that justified revisiting that determination. OUTCOME: Judgment vacated in part; matter remanded with instructions to recertify promotions class. CORE TERMS ... stage. Instead, the merits of a claim may be considered only when relevant to determining whether the Rule 23 prerequisites for class certification are satisfied. Evidence > Procedural Considerations > Weight & Sufficiency ... Procedure> Class Actions > Prerequisites > General Overview [HN8] While an evaluation of the merits to determine the strength of the plaintiffs' case is not part

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01295633.pdf

EFTA01262965Set 10

2019-07-1159p13,712w

warrant. 35. In conducting this review, law enforcement may use various techniques to determine which files or other ESI contain evidence or fruits of the Subject Offenses. Such techniques ... opening" or reading the first few "pages" of such files in order to determine their precise contents (analogous to performing a cursory examination of each document in a file cabinet ... determine its relevance); • "scanning" storage areas to discover and possibly recover recently deleted data or deliberately hidden files; and • performing electronic keyword searches through all electronic storage areas to determine

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01262965.pdf

EFTA00623729Set 9

2007-07-1317p7,650w

Cayman Islands at such other location as the Directors may from time to time determine. 3. The objects for which the Company is established are unrestricted, and the Company shall ... such address in the Cayman Islands as the Directors shall from time to time determine. The Company may in addition establish and maintain such other offii-es and places ... business and agencies in such places as the Directors may from time to time determine. SHARES in 7. The Company may insofar as may be permitted

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00623729.pdf

EFTA01144994Set 9

2011-12-0952p22,723w

time (the "Partnership Agreement"). You should consult your financial, tax and legal advisors to determine whether an investment in the Fund is suitable for you. Please see the Partnership Agreement ... BlueMountain Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Investment Manager"), in determining the Fund's compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws and regulations and the suitability ... there are substantial risks of loss incidental to the purchase of Interests, and has determined that the Interests are a suitable investment for the Investor. (I) The Investor is aware

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01144994.pdf

EFTA00731431Set 9

2008-07-1066p17,583w

endeavor to construe statutes to effectuate the intent of the Legislature."). To determine that intent, we look first to the statute's plain language ... that renders this language superfluous. B. Exploring Legislative History The State argues that in determining the Legislature's intent, we should also review the statute's legislative history, and that ... certainly agree that the bill title may be helpful in determining legislative intent. See, e.g., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Easton, 894 So. 2d 20, 25 (Fla. 2004) (quoting

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00731431.pdf

EFTA00187391Set 9

1998-03-3193p40,205w

than UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, one interpretation, and the court makes this I determination by reference to the contract Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn alone. Bank, Debra ... collected rent from Fisher through Sep- is not to "weigh the evidence and determine tember 30, 1996). Additionally, I ordered the truth of the matter but to determine Fisher ... last issue to be decided on this motion tract itself to determine the parties' intent. is whether OFM was entitled to refuse Ep- Stroll I Epstein 818 F.Supp

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00187391.pdf

EFTA01353688Set 10

Terminated Transactions. will act in good faith and Any Close-out Amount will be determined by the Determining Party (or its agent), which order to produce a commercially reasonable result ... Determining use commercially reasonable procedures in for any group of Terminated Transactions or any individual Terminated Party may determine a Close-out Amount for not less than all Terminated Transactions ... that would not be commercially reasonable. as of the date or dates determined as of the Early following the Early Termination Date as would be commercially reasonable. legal fees

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01353688.pdf

EFTA01424445Set 10

2018-05-3051p7,829w

alert purposes only and is not to be used for purposes of determining an individual's eligibility for any credit or any other FCRA permissible purposes. User further agrees ... alert purposes only and is not to be used for purposes of determining an individual's eligibility for any credit or any other FCRA permissible purposes. User further agrees ... alert purposes only and is not to be used for purposes of determining an EFTA01424451 individual's eligibility for any credit or any other FCRA permissible purposes. User further agrees

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01424445.pdf

EFTA01119335Set 9

2011-01-1111p11,650w

review process for these changes further the nationwide minimum national standards for sex determining that jurisdictions have offender registration and notification in substantially implemented the SORNA implementation of the remainder ... jurisdictions in their SORNA become SORNA registration Congress. However, SORNA expressly implementation efforts and determines jurisdictions and to implement SORNA. affords the Attorney General authority whether jurisdictions have successfully ... implement SORNA and solicited public comment on respect to particular measures therein. for determining whether jurisdictions supplemental guidelines addressing The grounds of support included the have substantially implemented SORNA these

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01119335.pdf

EFTA00070837Set 9

2021-03-1241p13,013w

victims, patients, or plaintiffs—including those whom Dr. Rocchio has treated or evaluated—the determination of whether grooming has occurred is a subjective judgment hinging largely on the credibility ... Government agrees that Dr. Dietz may offer an opinion on the difficulty of accurately determining whether an act constitutes grooming, in response to Dr. Rocchio. Although his remaining opinions purport ... core details of the allegation are often used by professionals as indices in determining the credibility of a victim's claims." (Ex. A at 10). • "Additional research is needed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070837.pdf

Page 1

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

December 2025

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset1,000 total

Set 8

10

Set 9

542

Set 10

403

Set 11

45