EFTA00209415Set 9
2013-08-137p1,203w
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee
ROY BLACK ET AL.,
Intervenor/Appellants
INTERVENORS/APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES' RENEWED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
RULING ON PENDING MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT
DISCOVERY ORDER ... Intervenors/Appellants oppose plaintiffs/appellees' Renewed Motion for
Expedited Ruling on Pending Motion for Stay of District Court Discovery Order.
This is the second time that plaintiffs/appellees have sought an expedited ruling ... stay motion would be held in abeyance until the Court issued
an order on plaintiffs/appellees' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. On August
19, 2013, the Court ordered that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209415.pdf
EFTA00613897Set 9
2013-08-137p1,224w
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee
ROY BLACK ET AL.,
Intervenor/Appellants
INTERVENORS/APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES' RENEWED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
RULING ON PENDING MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT
DISCOVERY ORDER ... Intervenors/Appellants oppose plaintiffs/appellees' Renewed Motion for
Expedited Ruling on Pending Motion for Stay of District Court Discovery Order.
This is the second time that plaintiffs/appellees have sought an expedited ruling ... stay motion would be held in abeyance until the Court issued
an order on plaintiffs/appellees' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. On August
19, 2013, the Court ordered that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00613897.pdf
EFTA00583878Set 9
2013-08-088p1,625w
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee
ROY BLACK ET AL.,
Intervenor/Appellants
INTERVENORS/APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON
MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY ORDER AND
MOTION ... RULES ON PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK
OF JURISDICTION
On August 8, 2013, plaintiffs/appellees filed two motions, one asking for an
expedited ruling by the Court on intervenors/appellants' pending ... jurisdictional issue, in the context of full briefing on the
merits.
I. PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING
ON MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY
ORDER SHOULD BE DENIED
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583878.pdf
EFTA00209657Set 9
2013-08-0575p16,720w
JURISDICTION
The district court has jurisdiction of this action as an action by the
plaintiffs/appellees against the United States as defendant seeking to enforce their
rights under the Crime Victims ... PERLMAN DOCTRINE.
The question of this Court's jurisdiction has been addressed in
plaintiffs/appellees' Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal, filed with
this Court on July 2, 2013, intervenors/appellants
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209657.pdf