Epstein Files Search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

December 2025

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset28 total

Set 10

results for “"IWP Clients"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA01408512Set 10

1p300w

Sheet1 Revenue Summary Client Analysis Summary Onboarding Pipeline Period outstanding (days) Region # IWP Clients w revs 2018 Total revs 2018 (€000s) # IWP Clients w revs 2019 (€000s) Total revs ... 000s) Total IWP Clients onboarded Total IWP Client entities onboarded # of Client entities onboarded YTD of which: Actively trading of which: Active dialogue of which: No access of which ... Footnotes: • YTD - as of April 2019 month end • Actively trading: IWP client entities generating revenues in 2018, 2019 and or pipeline deal for 2019; • Active dialogue: No revenues last year

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408512.pdf

EFTA01399698Set 10

2019-02-254p476w

without revenues, which answered the questions from the MRMs on how to activate more IWP clients / pipeline. Big opportunity one would hope. fcid:image001.png@OlD4CD12.037F2EA01 EFTA01399701

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01399698.pdf

EFTA01400050Set 10

2019-06-124p581w

please cast your eye over one last time. Anything listed as an IWP Client should have an IWP Adoption Package. Thanks Ian From: Davide-A Sferrazza Sent: Sunday, June ... over 7,000 line items in dbForce to identify who should be tagged as IWP Clients / Leads and which clients need to be removed. I have then cross reference this ... which ones did not. So in the scrub file, it highlights: Who are IWP clients or Leads; Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01400050.pdf

EFTA01362564Set 10

2019-05-291p406w

over 7,000 line items in dbForce to identify who should be tagged as IWP Clients / Leads and which clients need to be removed. I have then cross reference this ... which ones did not. So in the scrub file, it highlights: • Who are IWP clients or Leads; • Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01362564.pdf

EFTA01408689Set 10

2019-06-063p465w

over 7,000 line items in dbForce to identify who should be tagged as IWP Clients / Leads and which clients need to be removed. I have then cross reference this ... which ones did not. So in the scrub file, it highlights: Who are IWP clients or Leads; Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408689.pdf

EFTA01400003Set 10

2019-06-093p517w

over 7,000 line items in dbForce to identify who should be tagged as IWP Clients / Leads and which clients need to be removed. I have then cross reference this ... which ones did not. So in the scrub file, it highlights: Who are IWP clients or Leads; Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01400003.pdf

EFTA01406418Set 10

2019-05-292p421w

over 7,000 line items in dbForce to identify who should be tagged as IWP Clients / Leads and which clients need to be removed. I have then cross reference this ... which ones did not. So in the scrub file, it highlights: Who are IWP clients or Leads; Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01406418.pdf

EFTA01408499Set 10

2019-05-165p766w

align and update the table, adding commentary if needed: We show 91 IWP clients generating revenues in 2019 but 60 actively trading (definition of which is 'generating revenues') What

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408499.pdf

EFTA01408541Set 10

2019-02-287p973w

clients you previously advised of): Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): A) Wealth Management fcid:image002.png@OlD4CE87.149683F01

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408541.pdf

EFTA01408513Set 10

2019-02-2412p1,295w

feasible alternative (62 or almost 50% for ISG and 30 or almost 40% of IWP clients)? If offboarding is not an option, please provide business rationale/commercial viability. - other outstanding

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408513.pdf

EFTA01400054Set 10

2019-02-254p610w

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01400054.pdf

EFTA01400058Set 10

2019-02-285p712w

clients you previously advised of): Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): EFTA01400060 A) Wealth Management fcid:image002.png@OlD4CE87.149B83F01

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01400058.pdf

EFTA01399998Set 10

2019-02-275p700w

clients you previously advised of): Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): A) Wealth Management EFTA01400000 fcid:image002.png@OlD4CE87.149683F01

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01399998.pdf

EFTA01357135Set 10

1p317w

IWP clients or Leads; • Who has a package (client) and who does not (lead). You can ignore the PM Qualified tags as this relates to Private Markets. Can you quickly

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01357135.pdf

EFTA01408588Set 10

2019-03-055p692w

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408588.pdf

EFTA01408701Set 10

2019-03-014p467w

clients you previously advised of): Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): EFTA01408702 A) Wealth Management fcid:image001.png@OlD4CDC9.6EF271101

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408701.pdf

EFTA01408698Set 10

2019-02-263p382w

previously advised of): EFTA01408698 Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): A) Wealth Management fcid:image001.png@OlD4CDC9.6EF271101 B) IWP

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01408698.pdf

EFTA01357119Set 10

2019-02-251p491w

clients you previously advised of): Nina / Davide — can you please work together on the IWP clients (understand that Southern Financial is going away): A) Wealth Management Hay Rho <Mint

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01357119.pdf

EFTA01399587Set 10

2019-02-154p846w

will not be creating separate KOP's; Brexit requirements: Remediate KYC for WM & IWP clients to meet CIB standards Resend new ADL to letter to all clients (when redraft agreed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01399587.pdf

EFTA01399171Set 10

2019-02-154p769w

will not be creating separate KOP's; Brexit requirements: Remediate KYC for WM & IWP clients to meet CIB standards Resend new ADL to letter to all clients (when redraft agreed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01399171.pdf