""Incomes Grew"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

19 results for “"Incomes Grew"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA01205723Set 9

2015-04-1938p12,057w

protected from."" EFTA01205736 — Saundra Hopkins From 1979-2012, the 1 Percent's Incomes Grew by 181 Percent h the same period. to rest of me country sax an incmase ... true we have to ask why since 1970 to the Top 196's income grew by 1.81.% while the bottom 99%'s income only grew by 2.6% and worker' productivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01205723.pdf

EFTA02719125Set 11

2015-04-1931p11,024w

true we have to ask why since 1970 to the Top=1%'s income grew by 181% while the bottom 99%'s income only grew by 2.6% and worker' productiv

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02719125.pdf

EFTA01201976Set 9

2015-01-1829p11,332w

captured 95% of the increase of national income. In other words The Top 1% incomes grew by 31.4% while The Bottom 99% incomes grew by 0.4%. In his book, Smith

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01201976.pdf

EFTA02716846Set 11

2015-01-1828p11,060w

captured 95% of the increase of national income. In other words The Top 1% incomes grew by 31.4% while The Bottom 99% incomes grew by 0.4%. In his book, Smith

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02716846.pdf

EFTA00591133Set 9

2013-03-097p2,529w

family grew modestly by 1.7% but the gains were very uneven. Top i% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top t% captured

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00591133.pdf

EFTA00702684Set 9

2013-03-1726p14,945w

family grew modestly by 1.7% but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top i% captured

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00702684.pdf

EFTA00652576Set 9

2013-03-1026p14,266w

family grew modestly by 1.7% but the gains were very uneven. Top 196 incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1.% captured

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00652576.pdf

EFTA01427451Set 10

2015-06-10369p97,683w

compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 48%. During this period, our operating income grew from $15 million to $179 million, which represents a CAGR of 86%, while ... income grew from $23 million to $102 million, which represents a CAGR of 45%. Given the size and scale we have reached, we expect our growth rates to moderate

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01427451.pdf

EFTA00638630Set 9

2016-09-2535p10,821w

encouraging that the gains started with the workers who earn the least. Income grew most for the lowest-earning workers and least for the highest-earning ones, though all income

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00638630.pdf

EFTA01121739Set 9

2012-10-234p1,532w

since the Great Depression, median family income has fallen substantially over an entire decade. Income grew slowly through most of the last decade, except at the top of the distribution

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01121739.pdf

EFTA00701509Set 9

2012-10-2816p9,959w

since the Great Depression, median family income has fallen substantially over an entire decade. Income grew slowly through most of the last decade, except at the top of the distribution

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00701509.pdf

EFTA01133078Set 9

2013-09-2932p16,668w

inequality. We had low deficits and taxes on the rich hovered around 5o%. And incomes grew for almost everyone. On this issue of widening inequality there's so much confusion

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01133078.pdf

EFTA00396443Set 9

2013-02-067p2,142w

parks grew) (trading +2.7%) • Equity Residential profit surged on better real estate sales & rental income grew (trading +1%) • Expedia eps missed but easily beat O4 sales forecasts (record inc rooms

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00396443.pdf

EFTA01205761Set 9

middle classes find themselves slipping into poverty: From 1979-2012, the 1 Percent's Incomes Grew by 181 Percent in the same period. the rest of the country

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01205761.pdf

EFTA02719156Set 11

2015-01-264p639w

middle classes find themselves slipping into poverty: From 1979-2012, the 1 Percent's Incomes Grew by 181 Percent In the same period, the rest of the country

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02719156.pdf

EFTA01132209Set 9

2014-11-1631p13,305w

government data. And what wage gains have occurred have benefited mainly the wealthiest. Average income grew 10 percent from 2010 through 2013 for the wealthiest one-tenth of Americans, after

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01132209.pdf

EFTA01070576Set 9

2011-08-113p2,223w

rentier class when I mentioned concerns about zero interest rates. Other assumptions: earned income grew at 2.5% a year over the last 30 years. Savings invested at a declining spread

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01070576.pdf

EFTA00929804Set 9

2012-02-2218p6,209w

decades. From 1947, when India won its independence, through the 1980s, annual per- capita income grew at 1.3% per year, a snail's pace oft-derided by the EFTA00929815 Indian

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00929804.pdf

EFTA01842218Set 10

2012-02-2027p6,240w

decades. From 1947, when India won its independence, through the 1980s, annual per-capita income grew at 1.3% per year, a snail's pace oft-derided by the Indian elite

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01842218.pdf

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

April 2015

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset19 total

Set 9

14

Set 10

2

Set 11

3