Epstein Files Search

EFTA00613999Set 9

2011-07-2125p7,382w

with the contract language," then "[the] [c]ontract terms themselves will be controlling." Eagle Indus., Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del. 1997). A court determines ... extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties." Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232. Because Jeepers has failed to demonstrate that the contract unambiguously ... fairly susceptible of different interpretations or may have two or more different meanings." Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232. Accordingly, for Jeepers to prevail on this point, it must

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00613999.pdf

EFTA01077375Set 9

2011-07-2125p7,381w

with the contract language," then "[the] [c]ontract terms themselves will be controlling." Eagle Indus., Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del. 1997). A court determines ... extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties." Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232. Because Jeepers has failed to demonstrate that the contract unambiguously ... fairly susceptible of different interpretations or may have two or more different meanings." Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232. Accordingly, for Jeepers to prevail on this point, it must

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01077375.pdf

EFTA00807267Set 9

2019-03-2012p6,957w

Assigned Drivers: Jeffery E. Epstein, Valdson V. Cotrin no. MARCH 20, 2020 2 Inclusive / Indus 6100 Red Hook Quarter B3 St Thomas, USVI woad by Boomerang Came 3 Daiwa ... Assigned Drivers: Jeffery E. Epstein, Valdson V. Cotrin MARCH 20, 2020 3 2 Inclusive / Indus 6100 Red Hook Quarter B3 St Thomas, USVI hawed by / puma par Boomerang Carnets ... MARCH 20, 2020 Assigned Drivers: Jeffery E. Epstein, Valdson V. Cotrin no. Inclusive / Indus 6100 Red Hook Quarter B3 St Thomas, USVI " unit / Boomerang Carnets 00802 USA DESCRIPTION OP VEHICLE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00807267.pdf

EFTA00797069Set 9

2017-12-28186p61,016w

following chart shows three general areas of federal law that impact the cannabis indus- try—food and drug regulation, banking and finance, and intellectual property—as well as specific laws ... share the belief held by many that, ultimately, established companies from analogous indus- tries —alcohol, pharmaceutical, tobacco and consumer products—will enter the cannabis industry through minority investment, by acquisition ... nascent cannabis industry is often viewed by investors and others as a single, homogeneous indus- try, in much the same way the "technology" industry was viewed in the early 1990s

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797069.pdf

EFTA01105263Set 9

2004-10-0160p17,309w

extrinsic evidence may not be used to create an ambiguity in a contract. Eagle Indus., Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (De1.1997) ("If a contract ... that extrinsic evidence should be considered even when the contract was unambiguous. See Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232 n.7. 1604650vI 17 EFTA01105279 unambiguous is answered without resort ... backward-looking evidence gathered after the time of contracting is not usually helpful." Eagle Indus., 702 A.2d at 1233 n.11 (emphasis added); See, e.g., Agranoff v. Miller

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01105263.pdf

EFTA01104798Set 9

2004-10-0160p17,336w

extrinsic evidence may not be used to create an ambiguity in a contract. Eagle Indus., Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (De1.1997) ("If a contract ... that extrinsic evidence should be considered even when the contract was unambiguous. See Eagle Indus., Inc., 702 A.2d at 1232 n.7. 1604650vI 17 EFTA01104814 unambiguous is answered without resort ... backward-looking evidence gathered after the time of contracting is not usually helpful." Eagle Indus., 702 A.2d at 1233 n.11 (emphasis added); See, e.g., Agranoff v. Miller

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01104798.pdf

EFTA00071966Set 9

2021-08-29156p45,042w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071966.pdf

EFTA00093702Set 9

2021-09-08162p46,046w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00093702.pdf

EFTA00080676Set 9

2021-08-23151p43,217w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator EFTA00080680 Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00080676.pdf

EFTA00070202Set 9

2021-08-31160p45,571w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070202.pdf

EFTA00070362Set 9

2021-09-10166p47,195w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070362.pdf

EFTA00093864Set 9

2021-09-09164p46,730w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00093864.pdf

EFTA00069716Set 9

2021-08-24153p44,082w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00069716.pdf

EFTA00070043Set 9

2021-08-30158p45,165w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070043.pdf

EFTA00072134Set 9

2021-08-22148p42,786w

through the SDNY courts. This time Judge Peck was the winning contestant Global Tech Indus. Grp. Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings Ltd. 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search ... Citator Global Tech Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Go Fun Grp. Holdings, Ltd., 17 Civ. 3727 (AJP) I Casetext Search + Citator Read Global Tech Indus

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00072134.pdf

EFTA01197325Set 9

2014-04-1824p5,755w

nothing more for the court to do but execute the judgment," Carpenter v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 541 F.3d 1048, 1052 (11th Cir. 2008) (quoting McMahon v. Presidential Airways ... this rule exist: the Perlman doctrine; the collateral-order doctrine, Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949); a certification provided by statute

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01197325.pdf

EFTA00807038Set 9

2017-08-0320p6,630w

Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2015) See also In re Mid-America Indus., Inc. 236 B.R. 640 (Bankr. N.D. Il 1999). 25. That a single judgment evidences that Sargent Trading Ltd and Sargent ... separate obligations does not help the Motion to Dismiss. In In re Mid-America Indus.. Inc. 236 B.R. 640 (1999), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts held

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00807038.pdf

EFTA00209657Set 9

2013-08-0575p16,720w

Church of Scientology v. United States, 506 U.S. 9 (1992) 46 Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 47 Cox v. Administrator U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d ... concerned with an interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949), not with the Perlman exception to the final judgment

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209657.pdf

EFTA01165659Set 9

44p8,425w

Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Ca1.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) 21 Indus. Power & Lighting Corp. v. W. Modular Corp., 623 P.2d 291, 298 (Alaska 1981) 22 Jackson ... which hold that the litigation privilege does not bar a malicious prosecution claim. See Indus. Power & Lighting Corp. v. W. Modular Corp., 623 P.2d 291, 298 (Alaska 1981), Sierra Madre

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01165659.pdf

EFTA00209534Set 9

2013-07-1225p5,708w

AUTHORITIES Cases Church of Scientology'. United States, 506 U.S. 9 (1992) 14 Cohenl. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 6 Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. I. South Florida Water ... concerned with an interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine of Cohen I. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949), not with the Perlman exception to the final judgment

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209534.pdf