Epstein Files Search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

May 2008

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset21 total

Set 9

Set 11

results for “"Jane Doe No.1"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00234033Set 9

2008-05-132p456w

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00234033.pdf

EFTA00209355Set 9

2007-09-2428p5,591w

brad@pathtojustice.com cassellp@law.utah.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209355 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Jane Doe

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209355.pdf

EFTA00211439Set 9

2016-05-2225p16,498w

Compel Answers to Supplemental Requests for Admissions and Requests for Production by Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 per Local Rule 5.4 by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Text

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211439.pdf

EFTA00313599Set 9

2008-05-135p797w

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE ... DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE ... deposes and says that: 1. 1 am the mother and natural guardian for Jane Doe No.1 as referenced in the Complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the United States

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00313599.pdf

EFTA00234030Set 9

2008-01-243p332w

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE ... deposes and says that: I. 1 am the mother and natural guardian for Jane Doe No.1 as referenced in the Complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the United States ... will be eighteen (18) years of age on May 13, 2008. 3. Jane Doe No.1 has been estranged from her father since Thanksgiving day, November 22, 2007. 4. On January

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00234030.pdf

EFTA00210594Set 9

2015-02-233p466w

state: I. Respondent United States of America has prepared its Opposition to Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210594.pdf

EFTA01128707Set 9

2013-07-0228p5,886w

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA01128707 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/02/2013 Page

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128707.pdf

EFTA00209567Set 9

2007-09-2428p5,531w

EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. the University of Utah Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209567 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to 11th

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209567.pdf

EFTA01081942Set 9

2015-02-233p498w

state: I. Respondent United States of America has prepared its Opposition to Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081942.pdf

EFTA02728711Set 11

2019-09-122p551w

filed by attorney Theodore Leopold. While he represent the purports to represent Jane Doe No.1, attorney Jeffrey Herman also claims to are presently interests of Jane Doe ... with the consent of the State Attorney's Office to the taking of Jane Doe No.1's deposition on February 20, 2008. The parties have also agreed that Mr. Leopold ... that date eliminating the need to use a process server to serve Jane Doe No.1. See Exhibit "A" attached. (Jane Doe No. 1's real name has been redacted from

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02728711.pdf

EFTA02728703Set 11

2008-02-083p768w

filed by attorney Theodore Leopold. While he represent the purports to represent Jane Doe No.1, attorney Jeffrey Herman also claims to firms are presently interests of Jane Doe ... with the consent of the State Attorney's Office to the taking of Jane Doe No.1's deposition on February 20, 2008. The parties have also agreed that Mr. Leopold ... that date eliminating the need to use a process server to serve Jane Doe No.1. See Exhibit "A" attached. (Jane Doe No. l's real name has been redacted from

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02728703.pdf

EFTA00209507Set 9

2013-07-1923p4,943w

EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. the University of Utah Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209507 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209507.pdf

EFTA01128656Set 9

2013-07-129p1,642w

Salt Lake City, UT 84112 1.1M Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA01128656 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128656.pdf

EFTA00234042Set 9

2008-01-293p598w

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00234042.pdf

EFTA00201232Set 9

2009-04-244p692w

which are all currently pending before this Court. Counsel for Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Does No. 2-7 have both filed Memorandums in Opposition to Epstein's EFTA00201232 Case ... Plaintiffs Response In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint in Jane Doe No.1 v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CV-80893, D.E. 31)(Attached hereto as Exhibit

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00201232.pdf

EFTA00209453Set 9

2013-07-025p599w

brad@pathtojustice.com cassellp@law.utah.edu Attorneysfor Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209453 MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION INTRODUCTION This case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209453.pdf

EFTA01128695Set 9

2013-07-025p754w

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA01128695 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/08/2013 Page

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128695.pdf

EFTA01071953Set 9

2013-07-128p1,629w

brad@oathtojustice.com cassellp@law.utah.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA01071953 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 09/20/2013 Page: 2 of 8 RENEWED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01071953.pdf

EFTA00209494Set 9

13p2,264w

Cassell FARMER, JAFFEE, WEISSING EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209494 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. THIS COURT SHOULD

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209494.pdf

EFTA01072088Set 9

2013-07-1613p2,541w

brad @pathtojustice.com cassellp@law.utah.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA01072088 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 2 of 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01072088.pdf