EFTA00028929Set 8
2017-04-1334p8,953w
United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) 22
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368 (2d Cir. 2018) 23, 25
United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... affiant's deliberate falsehood or reckless
disregard for the truth." United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 397 (2d Cir. 2018). Here, there
is no dispute that (i) AUSA representations ... from the defendant by willful disobedience of law," id. at 1214.
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 386 (2d Cir. 2018) ("It is within the court's inherent
authority
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028929.pdf
EFTA00029100Set 8
2017-04-1334p8,943w
United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) 22
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368 (2d Cir. 2018) 23, 25
United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... affiant's deliberate falsehood or reckless
disregard for the truth." United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 397 (2d Cir. 2018). Here, there
is no dispute that (i) AUSA representations ... from the defendant by willful disobedience of law," id. at 1214.
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 386 (2d Cir. 2018) ("It is within the court's inherent
authority
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029100.pdf
EFTA00077571Set 9
2017-04-1334p9,022w
United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) 22
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368 (2d Cir. 2018) 23, 25
United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... affiant's deliberate falsehood or reckless
disregard for the truth." United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 397 (2d Cir. 2018). Here, there
is no dispute that (i) AUSA representations ... from the defendant by willful disobedience of law," id. at 1214.
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 386 (2d Cir. 2018) ("It is within the court's inherent
authority
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077571.pdf
EFTA00086658Set 9
2017-06-3023p6,016w
United States v. Cortina, 630 F.3d 1207 (7th Cir. 1980) 16
United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368 (2d Cir. 2018) 16
United States v. Paredes-Cordova ... taken from
the defendant by willful disobedience of law." (citation omitted)); United States v. Lambus, 897
F.3d 368, 386 (2d Cir. 2018) ("It is within the court's inherent authority
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086658.pdf
EFTA00066510Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
inherent or supervisory power `as a substitute for Fourth Amendment
jurisprudence!" United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 401 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United
States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to
suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02.
The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf
EFTA00087251Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
inherent or supervisory power `as a substitute for Fourth Amendment
jurisprudence!" United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 401 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United
States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to
suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02.
The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf
EFTA00106039Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,241w
inherent or supervisory power `as a substitute for Fourth Amendment
jurisprudence!" United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 401 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United
States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to
suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02.
The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf
EFTA00087230Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
inherent or supervisory power `as a substitute for Fourth Amendment
jurisprudence!" United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 401 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United
States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to
suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02.
The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf
EFTA00040664Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
inherent or supervisory power `as a substitute for Fourth Amendment
jurisprudence!" United States v. Lambus, 897 F.3d 368, 401 (2d Cir. 2018) (quoting United
States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d ... analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to
suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02.
The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf