Epstein Files Search

EFTA00028903Set 8

2021-01-1122p6,173w

Other Authorities Senator Leahy, Amber Legislation, Cong. Rec. 149:50, 55147 (2003) 3 iv EFTA00028907 Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Reply Memorandum in Support of her Motion to Dismiss Counts ... original House-passed bill that would have extended the limitations period retroactively." Senator Leahy, Amber Legislation, Cong. Rec. 149:50, S5147 (2003). The Court need look no further. Such ... Congress' explicit rejection of a retroactivity provision is not probative, because according to Senator Leahy's floor statement, the decision was grounded in concerns about the revival of time-barred

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028903.pdf

EFTA00712749Set 9

2012-09-0650p18,372w

information, to Hollywood filmmakers producing a movie about the bin Laden raid). 18. Patrick Leahy As chair of the Appropriations subcommittee for State, foreign operations, and related programs, 37-year ... Senate veteran Patrick Leahy essentially controls the U.S. foreign aid budget. An outspoken congressional leader on human rights issues, he's the author of the 1997 "Leahy Law," which prohibits ... assistance to foreign militaries deemed responsible for human rights violations. Leahy has EFTA00712782 advocated suspending Egypt's military aid until the country fully commits to democracy and the rule

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00712749.pdf

EFTA00103709Set 9

2018-08-0925p6,523w

Robert A. Katzmann, Judging Statutes (2014), at 3 7 iv EFTA00103713 Senator Leahy, Amber Legislation, Cong. Rec. 149:50, 55147 (2003) 7 v EFTA00103714 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits ... conferenced to resolve differences between the bills, the retroactivity provision was omitted. As Senator Leahy, one of the bill's original co-sponsors and a former chair of the Senate ... original House- passed bill that would have extended the limitations period retroactively." Senator Leahy, Amber Legislation, Cong. Rec. 149:50, S5147 (2003). Such a clear expression of congressional intent should

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103709.pdf

EFTA00045963Set 9removed from DOJ

2019-08-191000p211,050w

Audits Date Action Auditor Note Generated by Neonail Inc. lereArchivc errArchise Agent 1.en-lobsirr2-Zero

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00045963.pdf

EFTA00090494Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090494.pdf

EFTA00104652Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104652.pdf

EFTA00103343Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103343.pdf

EFTA00135626Set 9

2020-07-2241p25,522w

Answers On Expired FISA Programs. The Hilt (7/21, Rodrigo, 2.98M) reports Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Mike Lee (R-UT) on Thursday "pressed the Trump Administration on whether ... continuing to conduct surveillance operations by relying on Executive Order 12333." Sens. Leahy and Lee wrote, "Congress and the American people have a right to know if this

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00135626.pdf

EFTA00029540Set 8

2021-07-1234p11,084w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029540.pdf

EFTA00085225Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00085225.pdf

EFTA00105663Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105663.pdf

EFTA00148081Set 9

2021-01-2741p24,032w

Senate Can Organize After Filibuster Standoff. • Schumer Lists Goals For Country, New York, Impeachment. • Leahy Sent Home From Hospital After Falling • All But Five GOP Senators Vote To Declare Trump

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00148081.pdf

EFTA01655597Set 10

2025-02-0527p19,543w

drop a lawsuit. The article explained that The Star's CEO, Michael Patrick Leahy, posted on X that they received a letter from the Department of Justice confirming their consideration ... added that the reporting outlet has reached out to the FBI for confirmation of Leahy's post and more details on the alleged offer. EFTA01655609 Parents Accused of Torturing Their

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01655597.pdf

EFTA00103273Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103273.pdf

EFTA01929014Set 10

2014-04-2926p5,875w

century. Not surprisingly the aid delivery has met bipartisan resistance in Congress. Sen Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that oversees the State Department, announced that ... failure. The United States only abets further chaos in Egypt by backing it. Mr. Leahy said that he would hold new U.S. funding "until we have a better understanding

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01929014.pdf

EFTA00092755Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092755.pdf

EFTA00135998Set 9

2020-07-2252p26,132w

Programs. The Hill <https://thehill.corn/policy/technology/508437-senators-demand-answers-on-expired-surveillance- programs> (7/21, Rodrigo, 2.98M) reports Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Mike Lee (R-UT) on Thursday "pressed the Trump Administration on whether ... continuing to conduct surveillance operations by relying on Executive Order 12333." Sens. Leahy and Lee wrote, "Congress and the American people have a right to know if this

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00135998.pdf

EFTA00150007Set 9

2020-07-2243p25,516w

Answers On Expired FISA Programs. The Hill (7/21, Rodrigo, 2.98M) reports Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Mike Lee (R-UT) on Thursday "pressed the Trump Administration on whether ... continuing to conduct surveillance operations by relying on Executive Order 12333." Sens. Leahy and Lee wrote, "Congress and the American people have a right to know if this

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00150007.pdf

EFTA00154640Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00154640.pdf

EFTA00103308Set 9

2021-07-1234p11,087w

limitations does not. Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003). Senator Leahy, who co- sponsored the PROTECT Act, expressed concerns in a committee report that the proposed retroactivity ... previously time-barred." 149 Cong. Rec. S5137, S5147 (Apr. 10, 2003) (statement of Sen. Leahy). Congress removed the provision shortly thereafter for this reason. The removal of the express retroactivity

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103308.pdf