EFTA00791869Set 9
2019-03-1527p6,343w
sufficient to overcome any presumption of right to access. See, e.g., United States v.
Longueuil, 567 F. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014) (holding that district court properly
sealed ... particular circumstances
surrounding the production of a contested document"); see also United States v.
Longueuil, 567 F. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014) ("we see no abuse of discretion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00791869.pdf
EFTA00094804Set 9
2020-07-299p4,346w
F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987), cited with approval in United States v.
Longueuil, 567 Fed. App'x 13,16 (2d Cir. 2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media's motion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094804.pdf
EFTA00021861Set 8
2020-07-299p4,346w
F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987), cited with approval in United States v.
Longueuil, 567 Fed. App'x 13,16 (2d Cir. 2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media's motion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021861.pdf