EFTA00591160Set 9
2013-03-154p1,246w
Friday echo earlier criminal charges against SAC employees. In December,
prosecutors indicted Mathew Martoma, a former SAC portfolio manager at the center of the
questionable drug-stock trades tied ... said that only one former SAC employee had received tips.
A lawyer for Mr. Martoma said SAC's resolution of the two lawsuits had no bearing on his client ... decision to settle with the S.E.C. in no way changes the fact that Mathew
Martoma is an innocent man," said Charles A. Stillman, the lawyer. "We will never give
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00591160.pdf
EFTA00094804Set 9
2020-07-299p4,346w
parties have an opportunity to seek review of the orders. See, e.g., United
Staten. Martoma, No. 5112 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at •8 (S.D.N.Y ... United States v. Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 128 (2d
Cir. 1995)); United States v. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at *4
(S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094804.pdf
EFTA00637560Set 9
2016-01-084p608w
case. The
SEC's settlement order alleges that Cohen failed to reasonably supervise Matthew
Martoma, which resulted in Mr. Cohen's firm engaging in insider trading. Further,
it alleges that ... Cohen ignored several red flags that Martoma had access to inside
information.
EFTA00637561
Finally, the Order imposes some additional requirements on Mr. Cohen, including
requiring his family office to retain
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00637560.pdf
EFTA00071609Set 9
2021-02-1015p4,167w
ofJustice,
249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10
United States v. Martoma,
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5
United States v. Noel ... 02/10/21 Page 9 of 15
criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22
(S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071609.pdf
EFTA00105599Set 9
2021-02-1015p4,181w
ofJustice,
249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10
United States v. Martoma,
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5
United States v. Noel ... 02/10/21 Page 9 of 15
criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22
(S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105599.pdf
EFTA00088560Set 9
2021-02-1015p4,163w
ofJustice,
249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10
United States v. Martoma,
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5
United States v. Noel ... 02/10/21 Page 9 of 15
criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22
(S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088560.pdf
EFTA00021861Set 8
2020-07-299p4,346w
parties have an opportunity to seek review of the orders. See, e.g., United
Staten. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at •8 (S.D.N.Y ... United States a Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 128 (2d
Cir. 1995)); United States v. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at *4
(S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021861.pdf