EFTA00029100Set 8
2017-04-1334p8,943w
which Maxwell May Inquire
into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to
Judge McMahon 26
Conclusion 27
Certificate of Service 29
EFTA00029101
Table of Authorities
Cases
Abdell v. City ... United States Attorney's Office, in an a parte proceeding,
affirmatively misled Chief Judge McMahon to circumvent a Protective Order entered by one of
her colleagues. The prosecutor then exploited ... material he obtained to indict Maxwell.
Had the prosecutor not affirmatively misled Judge McMahon, the government would
never have obtained the 90,000 pages of material it now possesses, material
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029100.pdf
EFTA00077571Set 9
2017-04-1334p9,022w
which Maxwell May Inquire
into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to
Judge McMahon 26
Conclusion 27
Certificate of Service 29
EFTA00077572
Table of Authorities
Cases
Abdell v. City ... United States Attorney's Office, in an a parte proceeding,
affirmatively misled Chief Judge McMahon to circumvent a Protective Order entered by one of
her colleagues. The prosecutor then exploited ... material he obtained to indict Maxwell.
Had the prosecutor not affirmatively misled Judge McMahon, the government would
never have obtained the 90,000 pages of material it now possesses, material
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077571.pdf
EFTA00028929Set 8
2017-04-1334p8,953w
which Maxwell May Inquire
into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to
Judge McMahon 26
Conclusion 27
Certificate of Service 29
EFTA00028930
Table of Authorities
Cases
Abdell v. City ... United States Attorney's Office, in an a parte proceeding,
affirmatively misled Chief Judge McMahon to circumvent a Protective Order entered by one of
her colleagues. The prosecutor then exploited ... material he obtained to indict Maxwell.
Had the prosecutor not affirmatively misled Judge McMahon, the government would
never have obtained the 90,000 pages of material it now possesses, material
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028929.pdf
EFTA00066510Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
over the civil case passed away in March 2019, and so then-
Chief Judge McMahon heard the Government's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26,
2019, Judge ... McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v.
International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the
Government's application. Martindell held ... been improvidently granted or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or compelling
need.
Judge McMahon held a second ex parte hearing on April 9, 2019. At that hearing, citing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf
EFTA00087230Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
over the civil case passed away in March 2019, and so then-
Chief Judge McMahon heard the Government's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26,
2019, Judge ... McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v.
International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the
Government's application. Martindell held ... been improvidently granted or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or compelling
need.
Judge McMahon held a second ex parte hearing on April 9, 2019. At that hearing, citing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf
EFTA00040664Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
over the civil case passed away in March 2019, and so then-
Chief Judge McMahon heard the Government's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26,
2019, Judge ... McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v.
International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the
Government's application. Martindell held ... been improvidently granted or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or compelling
need.
Judge McMahon held a second ex parte hearing on April 9, 2019. At that hearing, citing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf
EFTA00106039Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,241w
over the civil case passed away in March 2019, and so then-
Chief Judge McMahon heard the Government's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26,
2019, Judge ... McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v.
International Telephone & Telegraph Cap., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the
Government's application. Martindell held ... been improvidently granted or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or compelling
need.
Judge McMahon held a second ex pane hearing on April 9, 2019. At that hearing, citing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf
EFTA00087251Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
over the civil case passed away in March 2019, and so then-
Chief Judge McMahon heard the Government's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26,
2019, Judge ... McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v.
International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the
Government's application. Martindell held ... been improvidently granted or upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances or compelling
need.
Judge McMahon held a second ex parte hearing on April 9, 2019. At that hearing, citing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf
EFTA00097649Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,543w
motion to suppress and the reply in support
thereof, the government misled Chief Judge McMahon to modify the Protective Order
and authorize the subpoena to Boies Schiller. The good faith ... obvious. Legitimately concerned about the propriety of its conduct in
misleading Chief Judge McMahon and issuing an unconstitutionally overbroad subpoena to
Boies Schiller, the government hoped to hedge its bets ... audacious request, the government argues this Court cannot evaluate the
propriety of Chief Judge McMahon's analysis of Martindell, because Judge McMahon is a co-
equal judge who exercised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097649.pdf
EFTA00100287Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,646w
motion to suppress and the reply in support
thereof, the government misled Chief Judge McMahon to modify the Giuffre Protective Order
and authorize the subpoena to Boies Schiller. The good ... obvious. Legitimately concerned about the propriety of its conduct in
misleading Chief Judge McMahon and issuing an unconstitutionally overbroad subpoena to
Boies Schiller, the government hoped to hedge its bets ... audacious request, the government argues this Court cannot evaluate the
propriety of Chief Judge McMahon's analysis of Martindell, because Judge McMahon is a co-
equal judge who exercised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00100287.pdf
EFTA00097331Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,558w
motion to suppress and the reply in support
thereof, the government misled Chief Judge McMahon to modify the Protective Order
and authorize the subpoena to Boies Schiller. The good faith ... obvious. Legitimately concerned about the propriety of its conduct in
misleading Chief Judge McMahon and issuing an unconstitutionally overbroad subpoena to
Boies Schiller, the government hoped to hedge its bets ... audacious request, the government argues this Court cannot evaluate the
propriety of Chief Judge McMahon's analysis of Martindell, because Judge McMahon is a co-
equal judge who exercised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097331.pdf
EFTA00018997Set 8
2014-10-2420p4,647w
motion to suppress and the reply in support
thereof, the government misled Chief Judge McMahon to modify the Giuffre Protective Order
and authorize the subpoena to Boies Schiller. The good ... obvious. Legitimately concerned about the propriety of its conduct in
misleading Chief Judge McMahon and issuing an unconstitutionally overbroad subpoena to
Boies Schiller, the government hoped to hedge its bets ... audacious request, the government argues this Court cannot evaluate the
propriety of Chief Judge McMahon's analysis of Martindell, because Judge McMahon is a co-
equal judge who exercised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018997.pdf
EFTA00164129Set 9
2023-06-0130p17,640w
that in 2020, the
Brooklyn U.S. attorney's office charged former police officer Michael McMahon, who allegedly
participated in illegal conduct involving China's government by investigating and tracking ... Attorney Irisa Chen, the article added, said in her opening statement Wednesday that McMahon was
hired to conduct surveillance and background checks for the Chinese government. Reuters reported that
McMahon ... took. The article detailed that in his opening statement before a federal
jury, McMahon's lawyer, Lawrence Lustberg, said his client was told he was working for a Chinese
construction
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00164129.pdf
EFTA00340648Set 9
2015-09-082p309w
renewing now. Will forward the letter as soon as I have
jeanne
From: Vicky McMahon [mail
Sent: Tuesday, Sept
To: Jeanne Brennan
Cc: Vicky McMahon
Subject: Fwd: Confirmation of Insurance ... know if he
needs something else for foreign travel.
All the best!
Vicky G. McMahon
ell
Forwarded mes
From: Vicky McMahon
Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 a :
Subject ... Jeanne W
Cc: Vicky McMahon
Jeanne, good morning.
Attached is the confirmation of coverage page from the carrier; however, it does not have a letter attached. Does
he need this
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00340648.pdf
EFTA00018749Set 8
2020-08-178p3,922w
July 30, she apparently did not know that, as described below, Chief Judge
McMahon had already granted an ex pane request from the government to obtain Ms. Maxwell's
deposition ... relief. The
government pressed its request in late March 2019 to Chief Judge McMahon and in April to
Magistrate Judge Netburn. During these ex parte proceedings, the government made numerous ... part of the Martindell-avoidance, ex pane processes in front of Judges Sweet, McMahon, and
Netbum.
The indictment with reference to sealed materials
On July 2, 2020, one day after
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018749.pdf
EFTA02072979Set 10
2015-10-312p340w
renewing now. Will
forward the letter as soon as I have
jeanne
From: Vicky McMahon Imailto
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:37 AM
To: Jeanne Brennan
Cc: Vicky McMahon ... know if he needs something else for foreign travel.
All the best!
Vic G. McMahon
cell
Forwarded messa e
From: Vicky McMahon
Date: Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at :
Subject ... Confirmation of Insurance
To: Jeanne W
Cc: Vicky McMahon
Jeanne, good morning.
Attached is the confirmation of coverage page from the carrier; however, it does
not have a letter attached
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02072979.pdf