EFTA00614554Set 9
5p3,653w
relying on
5 Paragraphs 9, 10, and II. And the key is the 5 McMurray versus U-Haul which is the Fourth
6 action was filed for the sole purpose ... Theft Statute 772.11. One, we think it's 10 again this is in the McMurray case — the
11 not applicable. Two is we don't think notice 11 non-existence ... want, the court goes to
18 it is not applicable. 18 the McMurray case, the heart of the McMurray
19 And in Paragraph 11 of the counterclaim 19 case which
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614554.pdf
EFTA00724269Set 9
5p3,674w
relying on
5 Paragraphs 9, 10, and II. And the key is the 5 McMurray versus U-Haul which is the Fourth
6 action was filed for the sole purpose ... Theft Statute 772.11. One, we think it's 10 again this is in the McMurray case — the
11 not applicable. Two is we don't think notice 11 non-existence ... want, the court goes to
18 it is not applicable. 18 the McMurray case, the heart of the McMurray
19 And in Paragraph 11 of the counterclaim 19 case which
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00724269.pdf
EFTA01111399Set 9
2011-04-1514p4,051w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief.
See, e.g., S&I Invs., 36 So. 3d at 917; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111399.pdf
EFTA01111344Set 9
2011-04-1513p3,706w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief. See,
e.g., Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice when
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111344.pdf
EFTA01108461Set 9
2011-04-1514p4,011w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief. See,
e.g., Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice when
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01108461.pdf
EFTA01111371Set 9
2011-04-1514p4,048w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief.
See, e.g., S&I Invs., 36 So. 3d at 917; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111371.pdf
EFTA01111385Set 9
2011-04-1514p4,058w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief.
See, e.g., S&I Invs., 36 So. 3d at 917; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111385.pdf
EFTA01111295Set 9
2009-12-217p2,134w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA
1983)(same); Blue ... filing of a complaint and subsequent amendments); Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055;
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)(counterclaim for abuse
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111295.pdf
EFTA00584338Set 9
2009-12-218p2,209w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA
1983)(same ... filing of a complaint and subsequent amendments); Della-
Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA
1983)(counterclaim for abuse
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584338.pdf
EFTA01112467Set 9
2010-03-2327p8,263w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983)(same); Blue ... Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v.
U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (counterclaim for abuse of process was
properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112467.pdf
EFTA01112592Set 9
2011-04-1514p4,092w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief.
See, e.g., S&I Invs., 36 So. 3d at 917; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112592.pdf
EFTA00306384Set 9
2012-03-297p1,819w
spurious claim is not itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Blue v Weinstein ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. I (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00306384.pdf
EFTA01147552Set 9
2012-03-297p1,773w
spurious claim is not in itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1983); Blue ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. 1 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01147552.pdf
EFTA01112610Set 9
2011-11-2116p4,697w
allegedly causing undue expenditure
of time and money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d
1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief. See, e.g., Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at
1209 (counterclaim for abuse of process was properly dismissed with prejudice when
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112610.pdf
EFTA01100909Set 9
16p3,889w
Donna v. Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051,
1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); McMurray v. U-Haul ... Donna v. Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
4 McMurray v. U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
5 Valdes
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100909.pdf
EFTA01111213Set 9
2012-03-297p1,765w
spurious claim is not in itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1983); Blue ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. 1 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111213.pdf
EFTA01112494Set 9
2010-03-2327p8,305w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983)(same); Blue ... Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v.
U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (counterclaim for abuse of process was
properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112494.pdf
EFTA01111357Set 9
2011-04-1514p3,942w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and
money did not constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209
(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same); Blue ... valid claim for relief. See,
e.g., Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray, 425 So. 2d at 1209 (counterclaim for abuse of
process was properly dismissed with prejudice when
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111357.pdf
EFTA00584348Set 9
2011-04-159p2,719w
allegedly causing undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA
1983)(same ... valid claim for relief.
See, e.g., Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray, 425 So. 2d 1208 (counterclaim for abuse
of process was properly dismissed with prejudice when based
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584348.pdf
EFTA01076581Set 9
2009-12-2130p7,583w
improper
or unlawful purposes, and (failed] to allege any post-issuance abuse of process.");
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (finding
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01076581.pdf