Teelucksingh v. Teelucksingh, 21 So. 3d 37, 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). See
also Melbourne HMA, LLC v. Schoof, 190 So. 3d 169, 170 (Ha. 5th DCA 2016)
("Strict compliance ... with rule 1.440 is required and failure to adhere to it is
reversible error." Melbourne HMA, LLC v. School 190 So. 3d 169, 170 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2016) (emphasis added