EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Settings
/
to search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Date Range
Undated only
–
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
2 results for “
"Michigan Court"
”
Export
EFTA01205046
Set 9
22p
14,332w
would vacate its stay and issue a ruling not incon- sistent with the
Michigan
court
's rulings. While the Illinois
court
refused to transfer the motion back to the
court
... that the
court
believed that the protective order should have been filed in the
Michigan
court
. Furthermore, even though the
court
stated that motions to quash subpoenas "must be filed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01205046.pdf
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
EFTA01759364
Set 10
1p
35w
Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Does Your Employment Separation Agreement Mean What You Think it Means?
Michigan
Court
Addresses Meaning of "Disparagement" :
Michigan
Employment Law Advisor 1 EFTA_R1_00063028 EFTA01759364
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01759364.pdf
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
December 2025
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
Results by Dataset
2 total
Set 9
1
Set 10
1