EFTA00284673Set 9
2012-08-245p3,084w
1Ø.00 450.00 750.00 0.00
GHL 8.242012 08/27,2012 Sell MON
......I, MONSANTO CO 500 1.9900 2.0000 98.497.77 IAEC GSCO 223 1.000.00 950.00 0.33 50.00 USO PerUnil
GHL 8.242012 08/27/2012 ... MONSANTO CO 500 4.5500 2.0000 228.500.00 MEC GSCO 0.00 1.000.00 950.00 0.00 50.00 USO PerUnil
GHL 8.242012 0827/2012 Sell MON ,4
............ MONSANTO CO 500 1.8900 20000 93,497.88 MEC GSCO ... PerUnil
GHL 6/242012 06129,2012 Sell MON MONSANTO CO 31.075 15.2500 0.0100 2.61837165 IAEC BARC 59.35 310.75 310.75 0.33 0.00 USO PerUnil
CHI 8242012 06129,2012 Sell MON MONSANTO CO
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00284673.pdf
EFTA00614311Set 9
1992-05-205p3,551w
material issues of The district court denied Westlands' motion to intervene
under Stalhvorth v. Monsanto Co., 558 F.2d 257 (5th
fact with respect to the alter-ego issue. I Amoco ... permissive intervention, the standard of review is abuse
of discretion. Stallworth v. Monsanto Co., 558 F.2d 257, 263 It seems plain to me that the public wants civil cases involving ... militating either for or against a determination
that the application is timely."Stallworth v. Monsanto Co.. 558 F.2d 257.264-66 (5th Cir.1977).
1 A case is authority only
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614311.pdf