Epstein Files Search

EFTA01191873Set 9

2015-01-2140p13,998w

ISSUES PENDING BEFORE THE COURT. The Court should also deny Dershowitz's motion for intervention because it would be a pointless exercise. Citing Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules ... Dershowitz's similar bullying tactics to succeed in this case." CONCLUSION Dershowitz's motion for intervention (DE 282) should be denied. 33 In the media, Dershowitz has said that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01191873.pdf

EFTA00593644Set 9

2015-01-023p491w

declaration for client; emailing regarding same. 4.90 1,470.00 KBC Analysis and planning motion for intervention, review of issues concerning striking of pleading 1.50 825.00 01/03/2015 BB Edits to motion

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00593644.pdf

EFTA01201962Set 9

2015-01-024p916w

FILE A SINGLE, CONSOLIDATED PLEADING IN RESPONSE TO ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MOTION FOR INTERVENTION, DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION, AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR INTERVENTION COME NOW Jane ... support their joinder in the case. On January 5, 2015, Dershowitz filed a motion for intervention in the case, seeking to contest some of the factual allegations made by Jane ... falsity). On January 12, 2015, Dershowitz filed a Supplement to his Motion for Intervention (DE 285) raising additional arguments about the why Jane Doe No. 3's allegations were

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01201962.pdf

EFTA00589566Set 9

2013-07-0811p3,198w

Epstein. Id. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case." Order Granting ... from disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. 4 EFTA00589569 II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589566.pdf

EFTA01128645Set 9

2013-07-0811p3,203w

Epstein. hi. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case." Order Granting ... EFTA01128648 disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128645.pdf

EFTA01128544Set 9

2016-04-0511p2,804w

stage). 4 EFTA01128547 hi. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case ... from disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128544.pdf

EFTA00812487Set 9

2016-04-2215p3,442w

Epstein. Id. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case." Order Granting ... from disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00812487.pdf

EFTA00211543Set 9

2016-04-2215p3,396w

Epstein. Id. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case." Order Granting ... from disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211543.pdf

EFTA01098196Set 9

2016-04-2215p3,442w

Epstein. Id. at 9-10. The order granting Mr. Epstein's motion allowed intervention "with regard to any remedy issue concerning the non-prosecution agreement in this case." Order Granting ... from disclosure by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)." Order on Motion for Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc. 256) at 1. II. THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098196.pdf

EFTA01196775Set 9

2011-09-2615p4,099w

courts concerning intervention. However, as is summarized in the paragraphs that follow, this motion for intervention stands upon dramatically different circumstances than the prior motion, which was denied. The proposed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01196775.pdf

EFTA01081376Set 9

2011-09-2610p2,385w

courts concerning intervention. However, as is summarized in the paragraphs that follow, this motion for intervention stands upon dramatically different circumstances than the prior motion, which was denied. The proposed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081376.pdf

EFTA01200036Set 9

2011-09-2610p2,469w

courts concerning intervention. However, as is summarized in the paragraphs that follow, this motion for intervention stands upon dramatically different circumstances than the prior motion, which was denied. The proposed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01200036.pdf

EFTA01098174Set 9

2013-07-1910p2,838w

plaintiffs object to this motion. The government does not object to this motion. I. INTERVENTION AS OF RIGHT. A party may intervene as of right under Rule

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098174.pdf

EFTA00205537Set 9

2012-03-292p387w

JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205537.pdf

EFTA00205011Set 9

2011-03-209p1,800w

briefing on the motion was fully completed. Rule 24(b) requires a "timely" motion for intervention. And it further requires the Court to consider whether the parties will be prejudiced

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205011.pdf

EFTA01099439Set 9

2014-09-222p389w

JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion of Jeffrey Epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099439.pdf

EFTA00795274Set 9

2011-05-168p1,883w

briefing on the motion was fully completed. Rule 24(b) requires a "timely" motion for intervention. And it further requires the Court to consider whether the parties will be prejudiced

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00795274.pdf

EFTA01196790Set 9

2015-02-284p1,138w

Crockett; 5.10 2,040.00 01/28/2015 GG further work on Reply in Support of Motion for Intervention; email corr w/legal team re same; integrated responses from Steve Safra

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01196790.pdf

EFTA00607078Set 9

2015-01-263p594w

victims"), to provide supplemental authority in support of their Response to Motion Limited Intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz (DE 291). In their response, the victims argued that a "sinister pattern

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00607078.pdf

EFTA00205539Set 9

2012-03-292p372w

JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY EPSTEINS' ATTORNEYS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205539.pdf