EFTA01660040Set 10
2015-03-0437p25,087w
Second), filed by Jane Doe.(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 02/27/2009)
03/02/2009 57 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support ... MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 57 Plaintiff's MOTION to
Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support ... granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond re 57 Plaintiff's MOTION to
Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law in Support
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660040.pdf
EFTA00723218Set 9
2009-12-0977p19,203w
minor
(Interrogatory No. 15). See August 4, 2009 Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel
Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents. See Infra for Attachments.
9. If the Fifth ... real, substantial and present!" See August 4, 2009 Order on Plaintiff's Motion to
Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents at 4 (attached as
Exhibit "B") and September ... JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to
Interrogatories and Production of Documents (D.E. #57). For the following reasons said
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00723218.pdf
EFTA00207075Set 9
2010-02-042p472w
Filer:
Document Number:462
Docket Text:
OMNIBUS ORDER DENYING [211] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Answers to Request for
Admissions filed by Jane Doe, DENYING [M] Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel ... Answers to
Interrogatories filed by Jane Doe, DENYING [196] Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to
Plaintiffs Interrogatories filed by Jane Doe, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART [210]
Plaintiffs ... Plaintiffs Request for Admissions filed by Jane Doe, Motions terminated:
[211] Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to Request for Admissions filed by Jane Doe, [M]
Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207075.pdf
EFTA01081484Set 9
2015-12-282p313w
Petitioners,
vs.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO SEAL OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION TO
COMPEL ANSWERS TO SUPPLEMENTAL REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
Respondent, by and through ... undersigned counsel, files its Motion to Seal Opposition
to Petitioners' Motion to Compel Answers to Supplemental Requests for Admission and
Requests for Production, and states:
I. On December ... petitioners filed their motion to temporarily seal their motion
to compel answers to supplemental requests for admissions and requests for production. D.E.
347. Petitioners then filed, under seal, their motion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081484.pdf
EFTA01091399Set 9
2015-12-284p535w
MOTION TO TEMPORARILY SEAL
THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO
SUPPLEMENTAL REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION
COME NOW Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane ... Jane Doe No. 2 filed their motion to
temporarily seal their motion to compel answers to supplemental requests for admissions and
requests for production. D.E. 347. Petitioners then filed, under ... seal, their motion to compel
answers.
2. On January 14, 2015, respondent filed its opposition to petitioners' motion to
compel answers to supplemental requests for admission and requests for production
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091399.pdf