EFTA00725476Set 9
2010-10-0814p3,130w
through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits the
following: 1) reply in support of Motion to Quash Service of Process (D.E.7) and Renewed
Motion to Quash (D.E.14); 2) response to Plaintiff ... follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff's response to Mr. Epstein's motion and renewed motion to quash service of
process attempts to distort the key issue before the Court with misstatements ... claims that Mr. Epstein was served on October 8, 2010. Defendant filed
a Motion to Quash Service of Process on October 29, 2010 (D.E.7), and a renewed motion to
quash
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725476.pdf
EFTA00722411Set 9
2010-10-0816p4,201w
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF M.J.'S RESPONSE TO ESPTEIN'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF
PROCESS AND MOTION FOR A HEARING TO PROVE FRAUD, TO PROVE
PROPER SERVICE, TO OBTAIN SANCTIONS ... ACCELERATED SCHEDULE
FOR DISCOVERY
Plaintiff, M.J., hereby files this response to Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of
Process and for a hearing to demonstrate fraud, to prove the defendant ... answer the complaint, however, on October 29, Epstein's legal
counsel filed a motion to "quash" service of process, alleging that process was not
properly made. Attached to the Motion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00722411.pdf
MOTHER
as parent and natural guardian,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
sand
Defendants.
DEFENDANT MOTION TO QUASH
SERVICE OF PROCESS AND SET ASIDE CLERK'S DEFAULT
Defendant , pursuant to Rules
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00729881.pdf