EFTA01091403Set 9
2009-04-3074p36,721w
Commodities Futures Trading Corn. V. Premex, Inc., 655 F.2d 779.783 n.2 (7. Cir.
1981); USSG. § 6A1.3, backg'd. comment.
36 Morissette v. United States ... that a request to "present evidence . ..
is not at issue here." Id. at 1014 n.2. Instead, the panel thought that the content of this speech
would be the "effects ... requested and granted if any information comes as a
surprise. Id. at 2203.04 & n.2. See also Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2465 (2007)
(district court subjects
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf
EFTA01125545Set 9
2009-03-1515p7,691w
right to present evidence and legal argument. Kenna I, 435 F.3d at 1014 & n.2
(distinguishing allocution from presentation of facts and argument).
In re Brock, slip ... opinions about the crime,
the defendant, and the appropriate sentence." Id. at 830 n.2 (emphasis supplied).
In United States v. Hughes, slip
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01125545.pdf
EFTA00598083Set 9
2006-04-2419p13,662w
Attie Foundation, Inc. [ 2003-2 USTC ¶50,719], 283
F.Supp.2d at 62 & n.2. But, this is not to say that the prior qualification determination made by the Secretary ... also till. of Schaumburg v. Citizens fora Better Env?, 444 U.S.
620, 643 n.2 (1980). Under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, an organization is entitled to federal
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598083.pdf
EFTA01116869Set 9
81p40,653w
Scar ON TRUSTS (1st ed.), supra note 2, i§ 156.1 n.2 & 1562
n.2. Warner v. Rice, Hay v. Price, Bryan v. Knickerbocker, and J.S. Menken Co. v.
Brinkley are discussed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01116869.pdf
EFTA00088802Set 9
2021-10-1184p23,883w
United States v.
Chandler, No. 19 Cr. 867 (PKC), 2021 WL 1851996, at *2 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. May 10, 2021).
The defense vaguely asserts that it cannot perform an independent investigation
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088802.pdf
EFTA02729494Set 11
2019-09-1226p5,117w
past or future proceedings");
Doe v. Hammond, 502 F. Supp. 2d 94, 100 & n.2 (D.D.C. 2007) (requiring
disclosure that "individuals are or were in the past subjects of grand jury ... Supp. 2d
at 140; Hammond, 502 F. Supp. 2d at 100-01 & n.2. That is not the case here.
13
09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDENTIAL
SDNY
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02729494.pdf
EFTA00175521Set 9
2008-07-1868p22,246w
Florida because he
is now incarcerated in a Florida jail." (DE 11 at 2 n.2.) This statement, besides being
nonresponsive,' is devoid of merit under binding Eleventh Circuit law, which ... sequitur as an opportunity to attach the "Epstein Sentence" (DE
11 at 2 n.2), an unmarked composite exhibit comprising, among other things, the terms,
2
EFTA00175544
Case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00175521.pdf
EFTA00802452Set 9
1997-03-0425p6,896w
time. See Baez v. Rathbun, No. 16-CV-
6552L, 2018 WL 3551630, at *2 n.2 (W.D.N.Y. July 24, 2018) (citing Gonzales v. Nat?
Westminster Bank PLC, 847 F. Supp ... n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)); deBecdelievre v.
Anastasia Musical LLC, No. 16 Civ. 9471 (AKH), 2018 WL 1633769, at n.8 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2,
2018); Reilly v. U.S. Physical Therapy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802452.pdf
EFTA01734187Set 10
2015-09-2137p7,279w
Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15
trir
CIV. 7433 (RWS), 2016 WL 831949, at *2 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 14
2016) ("Because New York has the most significant interest, New
York ... O5/02i16 Page 20 of 31
correspondence." Menninger Decl. 1 117 Supp. Reply at 5 n.2,
Documents .11045-46 contain communications between Defendant and
Barden; however, documents 81047-51 -include
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01734187.pdf
EFTA00210569Set 9
2015-02-2325p8,788w
crimes." Young'. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Rs S.A., 481 U.S. 787, 816 n.2
(1987) (Scalia, J., concurring). While victims clearly have an interest in the outcome of criminal
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210569.pdf