EFTA00211776Set 9
2007-07-1026p13,262w
F.3d 1547 (10th
Cir. 1995); Christman v. Brauvin Realty Advisors, Inc. , 185 F.R.D. 251 (N.D. III. 1999). In making that
showing, blanket assertions of the privilege are not proper ... client
communicated with his attorney are not privileged. Condon v. Petaque , 90 F.R.D. 53 (N.D. III. 1981). See
also Matter of Walsh , 623 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1980) (ledgers, bills ... documents.
F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States v. Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995),
contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211776.pdf
EFTA01091403Set 9
2009-04-3074p36,721w
right to be "reasonably heard." In United States v.
Marcello, 370 F.Supp.2d 745 (N.D. III. 2005), involving a bail hearing, the court concluded that
the "statute clearly and unambiguously ... offer relevant factual testimony. United States
v. Marcello, 370 F.Supp.2d 745, 745 (N.D. III. 2005) (excluding testimony of murder victim's
son at bail hearing where oral statement
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf
EFTA00728009Set 9
1996-02-2824p9,012w
Patterson v. Burge.
No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan 6, 2005) 4.5
Persky v. Yeshiva Univ.
No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM). 2002 WL 31769704 (S.D.N.Y ... materials. For example. in
Patterson v. Burge No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 2005), the court analyzed
under Rule 45(c) subpoenas issued by defendants
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728009.pdf
EFTA00207332Set 9
1996-02-2824p9,100w
Patterson v. Burge.
No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan 6, 2005) 4.5
Persky v. Yeshiva Univ.
No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM). 2002 WL 31769704 (S.D.N.Y ... materials. For example. in
Patterson v. Burge No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 2005), the court analyzed
under Rule 45(c) subpoenas issued by defendants
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207332.pdf
EFTA01091745Set 9
2016-05-1320p6,388w
NewKey Grp., LLC (In re SGK Ventures, LLC),
521 B.R. 842, 848 (Bankr. N.D. III. 2014) ("[T]he Seventh Circuit has repeatedly recognized the
availability of derivative . . . standing ... Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. 2005); In re Midway Airlines, Inc., 167 B.R. 880, 884 (Bankr. N.D. III. 1994) ("A
colorable claim (one seemingly valid and genuine) is not a difficult standard
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091745.pdf
EFTA00808672Set 9
2018-04-0314p4,028w
Abbott Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp.,
No. 97-C-1292, 2000 WL 1863543 (N.D. III. Dec. 14, 2000). Moreover, none of the general
references for which Edwards would have Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808672.pdf
EFTA00090721Set 9
2021-09-0352p13,922w
United States v. Bums, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448 (N.D. III. Oct. 27, 2009) 20, 21
United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090721.pdf
EFTA00210695Set 9
2008-07-0721p7,074w
necessary discovery. See, e.g., Olechl Vitl. of Willowbrook, 138 F. Supp. 2d 1036, 1046 (N.D.
III. 2000) ("The addition of a new party plaintiff can cause undue prejudice . . . where
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210695.pdf
EFTA00175470Set 9
2008-07-2151p10,530w
allegations. Cf., e.g., Woods v. Southwest Airlines, Co., 523 F.
Supp, 2d 812, 820 (N.D. III. 2007) (determining, in the context of diversity
jurisdiction, that the $75,000 threshold
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00175470.pdf
EFTA00222960Set 9
2007-06-183p1,798w
internal quotations omitted)).
Although unpublished, the case of United States' Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995),
contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222960.pdf
EFTA00211718Set 9
2007-04-2432p10,140w
legal effect.6 Dabertin I. HCR Manor Care, Inc., 68
F.Supp.2d 998, 1000 (N.D. III. 1999). Plainly, at the time the NPA was negotiated in 2007, the
then-current version
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211718.pdf
EFTA00808658Set 9
2018-04-0314p4,080w
Abbott Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp.,
No. 97-C-1292, 2000 WL 1863543 (N.D. III. Dec. 14, 2000). Had the Court issued the expansive
prohibition sought by Edwards, it would
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808658.pdf
EFTA00728161Set 9
2009-09-3019p6,423w
Last, in Alberts v. Wickes Lumber Co.., 1995 WL 117886 *4 (N.D. III. 1995), the
plaintiff sued her co-worker for sexual harassment, claiming that it caused severe emotional
impairment
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728161.pdf