EFTA01125545Set 9
2009-03-1515p7,691w
adult at
time of shooting); United States v. Merkosky, 2008 WL 1744762 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 11,
2008) (defendant cannot be deemed victim of uncharged crimes of government agents
against ... prosecution is already begun."
United States v. Merkosky, 2008 WL 1744762 at *2 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2008). Victims'
rights did not arise when they were victimized, but when
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01125545.pdf
EFTA00099352Set 9
2002-04-2638p10,958w
S.D.N.Y. 2010) 21
United States v. El-Sadig,
133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001) 17
United States v. Feldman,
939 F.3d ... third party
in United States v. El-Sadig, 133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001). In El-Sadig, the court held
that the defendant, who was alleged to have
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099352.pdf
EFTA00065989Set 9
2002-04-2638p11,008w
S.D.N.Y. 2010) 21
United States v. El-Sadig,
133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001) 17
United States v. Feldman,
939 F.3d ... third party
in United States v. El-Sadig, 133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001). In El-Sadig, the court held
that the defendant, who was alleged to have
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00065989.pdf
EFTA00028880Set 8
2016-01-1123p6,182w
United States v. El-Sadig,
133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio 2001) 3, 6
United States v. Feldman,
939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019) 5, 6, 10, 17
United ... Similarly, in United States v. El-Sadig, 133 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Ohio
2001), where a Saudi prince had entered into an agreement with the government that none
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028880.pdf
EFTA00017074Set 8
2020-05-2210p2,720w
documents based upon alleged evidentiary problems."); Krause v. Rhodes,
535 F. Supp. 338, 354 (N.D. Ohio 1979), aff'd, 671 F.2d 212 (6th Cir. 1982) ("It is not a ground
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00017074.pdf
EFTA01128686Set 9
2013-07-199p2,584w
United States v. White Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 509 F.Supp. 747,
750 (N.D. Ohio 1981)(names of grand jury witnesses fall within Rule 6(e)). The government,
however, despite
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128686.pdf
EFTA01098174Set 9
2013-07-1910p2,838w
United States v. White Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 509 F.Supp.
747, 750 (N.D. Ohio 1981)(names of grand jury witnesses fall within Rule 6(e)).
The government, however, despite
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098174.pdf
EFTA00209264Set 9
2013-07-199p2,604w
United States v. White Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 509 F.Supp.
747, 750 (N.D. Ohio 1981)(names of grand jury witnesses fall within Rule 6(e)). The
government, however, despite
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209264.pdf