""Non-Party Witness"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"Non-Party Witness"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00589467Set 9

2017-03-138p2,425w

most significant circumstance. It should be examined, however, from the perspective of a non-party witness' loyalty to the plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be. The closer ... bond, whether by reason of blood, friendship or business, the less likely the non-party witness would be to render testimony in order to damage the relationship. 2. The Degree ... Control of the Party Over the Non-Party Witness: The degree of control which the party has vested in the non-party witness in regard to the key facts

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589467.pdf

EFTA01206912Set 9

non-party witnes0; (3) the compatibility of the interests of the party and non-party witness in the outcome of the litigation and (4) the role of the non-party

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01206912.pdf

EFTA01078855Set 9

2015-04-0790p24,394w

thereafter as these questions would only be intended to embarrass and harass this non-party witness. b. Language and Harassment Limitations In addition, Jane Doe No. 3 requests that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01078855.pdf

EFTA00596449Set 9

2008-08-0836p11,867w

denying request to depose non-party witness where party seeking disclosure failed to demonstrate the information sought "could not be obtained from other sources"); Zallie, 2009 WL 2844429 ("the party ... Ct.M. Co. Oct. 25, 2006) ("a party seeking disclosure from a non-party witness must first demonstrate ... that the information sought ... can not be obtained from other sources") (quashing non

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00596449.pdf

EFTA01079203Set 9

2016-01-1260p13,979w

thereafter as these questions would only be intended to embarrass and harass this non-party witness. b. Language and Harassment Limitations In addition, Jane Doe No. 3 requests that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079203.pdf

EFTA01076133Set 9

2009-10-2625p7,430w

issuance of a protective order concerning a deposition duces tecum of a non-party witness, pursuant to Rule 1.280(B)(1)(c), Fla. R. Civ. P., providing that, where good

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01076133.pdf

EFTA00622175Set 9

2005-02-1754p7,431w

Relevant Relationships 3 2. The Degree of Control of the Party Over the Non-Party Witness 7 3. The Compatibility of the Interests of the Party and the Non-party ... Witness in the Outcome of the litigation 9 4. The Role of the Non-Party Witness in the Litigation 10 5. Other Factors Apart from the Non-Exclusive List ... Nature of the Relevant Relationships. The first LiButti factor is "the non-party witness' loyalty to the plaintiff or defendant, as the case may be" and how likely

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00622175.pdf

EFTA01078765Set 9

2015-04-0790p24,360w

thereafter as these questions would only be intended to embarrass and harass this non-party witness. b. Language and Harassment Limitations In addition, Jane Doe No. 3 requests that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01078765.pdf

EFTA00593661Set 9

Brinks, the Second Circuit allowed the jury to party has over the non-party witness in regard to make adverse inferences against Brinks due to the key facts and general ... Circuit wrote, "the mere fact that the witness no party and non-party witness in the outcome of the longer works for the corporate party should not litigation. The trial ... privilege advances the interests of both the Courts have rejected a non-party witness and the affected party in the outcome of the litigation. mechanical approach to determining whether

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00593661.pdf

EFTA01660077Set 10

2010-03-1014p3,764w

UFDL") provides a road map for litigants seeking to secure evidence from foreign non-party witnesses, stating (2) Whenever any mandate, writ or commission is issued out of any court ... Dated: March 12, 2010 Respectfully submitted, TAMA BETH KUDM AN, P.A. Attorney for Non-Party Witness, Jean Luc Bruhnel 777 South Flagler Drive Suite 800 - West Tower -5- EFTA01660081 Case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660077.pdf

EFTA00605112Set 9

2016-06-2029p7,816w

Document 228 Filed 06/20/16 Page 26 of 29 two Colorado non-party witnesses the same week in May, so as minimize Plaintiff's counsel's travel obligations. Plaintiff, however, rescheduled

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00605112.pdf

EFTA00619558Set 9

2016-06-2029p7,801w

Document 228 Filed 06/20/16 Page 26 of 29 two Colorado non-party witnesses the same week in May, so as minimize Plaintiff's counsel's travel obligations. Plaintiff, however, rescheduled

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00619558.pdf

EFTA00609377Set 9

2016-09-152p279w

Defendant. x WHEREAS on September 15, 2016, this Court ordered, inter alia, that non-party witness be directed to appear for deposition; and WHEREAS on January 17, 2017, non-party

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00609377.pdf

EFTA00583806Set 9

2011-05-236p1,635w

adversary in a manner that actually chills the availability of information by non-party witnesses; nor was it intended to make the discovery process so expensive that it could effectively

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583806.pdf

EFTA01103276Set 9

2011-05-239p2,023w

adversary in a manner that actually chills the availability of information by non-party witnesses; nor was it intended to make the discovery process so expensive that it could effectively

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01103276.pdf

EFTA00097394Set 9

2016-06-0612p3,169w

relevance to Plaintiff's request to take more than 10 depositions of non-party witnesses. Conspicuously absent from Plaintiff's motion are (a) any actual information she believes these witnesses ... cert denied, 459 U.S. 835 (1982) ("Furthermore, since King was a non-party witness, no adverse inference against appellees could have been drawn from his refusal to testify."). 3 EFTA00097398

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097394.pdf

EFTA00603019Set 9

2011-02-286p1,137w

which noted that Section 7 of the FAA "unambiguously authorizes arbitrators to summon non-party witnesses to give testimony and provide material evidence before an arbitration panel," and that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603019.pdf

EFTA00805389Set 9

2017-10-0518p5,208w

Jane Doe Matter, she gave deposition testimony and produced documents as a non-party witness in the Matter concerning her alleged interactions with the Intervenors, particularly with Mr. Epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805389.pdf

EFTA00179447Set 9

behalf of the U.S. District Court and served by an attorney upon a non-party witness. The second items are a deposition that was attended by a number of attorneys

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00179447.pdf

EFTA00211776Set 9

2007-07-1026p13,262w

party usually does not have standing to a subpoena directed to a non-party witness." Lansford v. Chyrsler Motors Corp. , 513 F.2d 1121, 1126 (2d Cir. 1975). For example

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211776.pdf

Page 1

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

March 2017

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset46 total

Set 9

43

Set 10

2

Set 11

1