Epstein Files Search

EFTA00030069Set 8

2021-03-092p252w

Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:56:11 +0000 Attachments: PROPOSED_REDACT1ONS - 2021.02.26 Government Omnibus ... Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response Thanks. When you can would you mind sending us our proposed redactions to pages ... Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response FYI From: Laura Menninger Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:08 PM To: Cc: >; (USANYS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030069.pdf

EFTA00029843Set 8

2021-03-091p169w

Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:00:37 +0000 Attachments: 2021.03.09_LAM_Letter to_Nathan_re_redactions_in_Govt_Response.pdf ... Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections to Gov't Proposed Redactions in Omnibus Response Dear Judge Nathan — Pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court's individual rules, attached ... forth Ms. Maxwell's objections to the redactions proposed by the government to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5. Also attached are exhibits setting forth Ms. Maxwell's proposed redactions

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029843.pdf

EFTA00023211Set 8

2021-10-182p291w

must be filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant ... Defendant should file an omnibus response brief to the Government's omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023211.pdf

EFTA00804036Set 9

2017-12-0111p3,394w

Edwards' Motion for Protective Order re C. 12.20 2,745.00 Wild; work on Omnibus Response to B. Edwards' Motion to Compel; 225.00/hr work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00804036.pdf

EFTA00015865Set 8

2021-05-049p2,792w

Victim-2 is expected to testify to that fact at trial. (See Gov't Omnibus Response, Dkt. No. 204 at 187 (citing Mem. in Opp. to Def.'s Renewed Motion ... later trip with Epstein, during which she met the defendant. (See Gov't Omnibus Response, Dkt. No. 204 at 187). The victim provided the Government with her entries relating

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015865.pdf

EFTA00029844Set 8

2021-03-093p1,166w

Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Objection to Proposed Redactions of Government's Omnibus Response & Exhibit 5 Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, we respectfully oppose certain

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029844.pdf

EFTA00793376Set 9

2017-09-215p784w

Served December 21, 2012 [D.E. 975] EFTA00793376 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's November 27, 2017, Omnibus Response in Opposition to Edwards' Four Motions to Compel [D.E. 1091] DATE: Tuesday, February

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793376.pdf

EFTA00807470Set 9

2018-03-1318p5,538w

Edwards' four Motions to Compel and the following related filing: a. 11/27/17, Epstein's Omnibus Response in Opposition to Edwards' Four Motions to Compel. 3. 10/26/17, Edwards' Motion for Protective

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00807470.pdf

EFTA00103377Set 9

2021-04-172p376w

Laura A. Menninger dated March 9, 2021 (Objection to Proposed Redactions of Government's Omnibus Response & Exhibit 5) at 2-3 aemoir detailing her private family matters released by Second

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103377.pdf

EFTA00092881Set 9

2021-04-192p320w

previously upheld the government's requested redaction of that individual's name from its Omnibus Response to Ms. Maxwell's Pretrial Motions and its accompanying Exhibit

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092881.pdf

EFTA00801703Set 9

2017-09-216p1,285w

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OMNIBUS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' FOUR MOTIONS TO COMPEL Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801703.pdf

EFTA00725741Set 9

2009-06-1219p3,162w

Jane Doe 6, and DE 52 - Jane Doe 7 ). Plaintiff filed their collective or omnibus response to the above matters in the Case No.: 80119, which can be found

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725741.pdf