EFTA00015303Set 8
22p5,018w
United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976) 9, 10
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 16
United States v. Place ... basis of perjury charges.
That is the lesson of United States v. Oshatz, in which this Court quashed a government
subpoena issued to a court reporter for a transcript ... defendant in a
civil proceeding. 700 F. Supp. 696, 697 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Oshatz (who had been indicted at the
time of his deposition) was deposed and did not invoke
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015303.pdf
EFTA00100287Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,646w
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d ... this reason that the government fails in its attempt to distinguish United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Resp. at 102. The government says that the logic ... Oshatz does not apply because the defendant there had already been indicted whereas here,
Maxwell was deposed "over two years before the Government opened its investigation." Resp
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00100287.pdf
EFTA00018997Set 8
2014-10-2420p4,647w
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d ... this reason that the government fails in its attempt to distinguish United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Resp. at 102. The government says that the logic ... Oshatz does not apply because the defendant there had already been indicted whereas here,
Maxwell was deposed "over two years before the Government opened its investigation." Resp
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018997.pdf
EFTA00097649Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,543w
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d ... this reason that the government fails in its attempt to distinguish United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Resp. at 102. The government says that the logic ... Oshatz does not apply because the defendant there had already been indicted whereas here,
Maxwell was deposed "over two years before the Government opened its investigation." Resp
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097649.pdf
EFTA00097331Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,558w
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d ... this reason that the government fails in its attempt to distinguish United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Resp. at 102. The government says that the logic ... Oshatz does not apply because the defendant there had already been indicted whereas here,
Maxwell was deposed "over two years before the Government opened its investigation." Resp
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097331.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
States v. Olivieri,
740 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 146
United States v. Oshatz,
700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 147, 148
United States v. Page,
657 F.3d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf
EFTA00086685Set 9
2016-03-1827p8,445w
Minpeco, 832 F.2d at 743. This is not a case, like United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696, 703 (S.D.N.Y. 1988), where the Government was trolling for evidence
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086685.pdf
EFTA01263246Set 10
2016-03-1826p8,431w
Minpeco, 832 F.2d at 743. This is not a case, like United States v.
Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696, 703 (S.D.N.Y. 1988), where the Government was trolling for evidence
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01263246.pdf