EFTA01132348Set 9
2013-09-167p1,834w
EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM
OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF
BRADLEY EDWARDS'S MOTION TO OVERRULE EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS
AND COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through ... this Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Motion to Overrule
Epstein's Objections and to Compel Answers to Interrogatories. In support thereof,
Epstein states:
INTRODUCTION ... this Court denied Epstein's Motion. As such, Edwards cannot
now receive an Order Overruling Epstein's invocation of the Attorney-Client Privilege
and use as a "sword" the information
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01132348.pdf
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER ON MOTION TO OVERRULE EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS
AND TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
THIS CAUSE came before the Court ... upon the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,
BRADLEY EDWARDS' Motion to Overrule EPSTEIN's Objections and to Compel Answers to
Interrogatories. The Court heard argument of counsel and is otherwise fully advised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01126540.pdf
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
Defendant(s).
ORDER ON ON MOTION TO OVERRULE EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS AND TO
COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
THIS CAUSE having come ... considered upon Counter-Plaintiff, Edwards' Motion to
Overrule Epstein's Objections and to Compel Answers to Interrogatories, and the Court having
reviewed the file and being fully advised
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01093423.pdf
EFTA00728793Set 9
2008-06-3018p4,681w
requests as
"needless, unwarranted and excessive." Doc. #127 at 5. This Court, however, firmly
overruled Epstein's objections. On July 31, 2009, this Court entered its own no-contact
order
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728793.pdf
EFTA01079679Set 9
2010-12-2726p6,194w
however, firmly
'needless, unwarranted and excessive." Doc. #127 at 5.
its own no-contact
overruled Epstein's objections. On July 31, 2009, this Court entered
order (in addition
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079679.pdf