EFTA00189955Set 9
2010-03-056p2,043w
singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2
("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to
show that g violation ... letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra
December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the
injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein ... Page 4
Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are
only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00189955.pdf
EFTA00213279Set 9
2010-03-056p2,041w
singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2
("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to
show that g violation ... letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra
December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the
injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein ... Page 4
Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are
only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213279.pdf
EFTA00233188Set 9
2009-09-0121p5,713w
predicate offense in the
singular, see, e.g., letter to Ken , December 4, 2007, p.2
("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to
show that ... element) and the letter from Mr. to Mr. , supra
December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the
injury element under the NPA ("were ... March 5, 2010
Page 4
October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are
only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00233188.pdf
EFTA00308324Set 9
2011-05-1615p3,768w
Molyneux,"
which is the collective term defined by Plaintiffs (First Amended Complaint, ¶4, p.2;
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, p.8, and Affidavit in support of Motion to Reconsider, p.2),
Defendant ... Motion to Dismiss, p.2, and the Court by Memorandum Opinion (p. 2), to refer to
Juan Pablo Molyneux, individually, and Molyneux Studio, Ltd. Based on the facts at bar, Juan
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00308324.pdf
EFTA00721999Set 9
2010-03-056p2,015w
singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2
("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to
show that a violation ... letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra
December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the
injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein ... Page 4
Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are
only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00721999.pdf
EFTA00014671Set 8
2021-05-128p2,459w
item requested is Accuser-2's
"entire diary from her teenage years." (Id., p.2) The "understanding" has no factual attribution
EFTA00014673
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
May 12, 2021
Page ... working to moot request 10" by having
the FBI secure the boots, Dkt. 269, p.2. This is an interference with Ms. Maxwell's ability to
investigate her defense without interference
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00014671.pdf
EFTA00213783Set 9
2007-05-1425p3,816w
Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 3340]
Phone
Fax
EFTA00213795
M0.324- P.2
JUI4.27.2208 3:39PM LEPO WPB FL
- .
U.S. Department of Justice
United Sums Attorney
Southern District ... Thank you.
Sincerely,
R. Alexander Acosta
By:
s tUnited StatesAttorney
CO: AUSA
EFTA00213797
NO.329 P.2
SUN.27.2009 5:55PM USAO WPB FL
U.S, Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213783.pdf
EFTA00096510Set 9
2021-05-128p2,471w
item requested is Accuser-2's
"entire diary from her teenage years." (Id., p.2) The "understanding" has no factual attribution
EFTA00096512
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
May 12, 2021
Page ... working to moot request 10" by having
the FBI secure the boots, Dkt. 269, p.2. This is an interference with Ms. Maxwell's ability to
investigate her defense without interference
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00096510.pdf
EFTA00157655Set 9
2008-06-1963p27,927w
Florida.° CEOS explicitly stated it "fully
understand[s] our argument" (CEOS letter at p.2) that Mr. Epstein should not be charged under
§ 2423(b) because the dominant purpose ... state charges
encompassing Epstein's conduct." See Tab I, May 19, 2008 Letter from , p.2,
2.
The Truth:
• It was the government, and not the defense that suggested a plea
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00157655.pdf
EFTA00261546Set 9
2014-05-2858p18,654w
March 1992, p.2; The Bulletin (Syd.), 31 March 1992,
[5] CPI), 29 April 1992, pp. 1826-34; CT,
Practice, 5th ed., pp. 715-
1992, p.2; Rann v. Olsen [2000] SASC
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00261546.pdf