EFTA00156400Set 9
2022-04-2945p15,329w
demonstrate that she
suffered actual and substantial prejudice from delay. United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 CR
541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018). Substantial ... memory resulting from the passage of
time have been held to be insufficient." Pierre-Louis, 2018 WL 4043140, at *4. And for any
evidence lost because of delay, the Defendant ... that at trial "the lost testimony or information was not available through other
means." Pierre-Louis, 2018 WL 4043140, at *4 (quoting United States v. Sprouts, 282 F.3d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00156400.pdf
EFTA00103709Set 9
2018-08-0925p6,523w
United States v. Napolitano,
761 F.2d 135 (2d Cir. 1985) 8
United States v. Pierre-Louis,
2018 WL 4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) 9
United States v. Rashkovski,
301 F.3d ... this clear evidence of congressional intent raised or considered in United States v. Pierre-Louis, 2018 WL
4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018), which the government cites in support
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103709.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
United States v. Perez,
940 F. Supp. 540 (S.D.N.Y.I996) 281
United States v. Pierre-Louis,
No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) passim
United States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf
EFTA00028903Set 8
2021-01-1122p6,173w
Supp. 3d 619 (ED. Va. 2019) 6, 7, 9
United States v. Pierre-Louis,
No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) 5
United States ... consideration of legislative history), cat denied, 546 U.S. 1007 (2005); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr.
541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *5.6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) (addressing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028903.pdf
EFTA00096142Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,993w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00096142.pdf
EFTA00103801Set 9
2019-07-0810p5,004w
time the previous statute was still running, the
extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL
4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103801.pdf
EFTA00105468Set 9
2019-07-0810p5,007w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105468.pdf
EFTA00068050Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,916w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00068050.pdf
EFTA00147211Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,993w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00147211.pdf
EFTA00078231Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,958w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078231.pdf
EFTA00105478Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,950w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105478.pdf
EFTA00089364Set 9
2020-07-0210p2,873w
time the
previous statute was still running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis,
No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089364.pdf
EFTA00099790Set 9
2019-07-0810p4,994w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099790.pdf
EFTA00023895Set 8
2021-04-1614p4,594w
Nader,
425 F. Supp. 3d 619, 629 (ED. Va. 2019); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 CR 541 (CM),
2018 WL 4043140, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018); United
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023895.pdf
EFTA00023910Set 8
2014-08-264p1,702w
coercion he has employed against at least some of them"); United States v. Pierre-Louis,
16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) ("Defendant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023910.pdf
EFTA00091739Set 9
2020-06-2910p2,782w
time the
previous statute was still running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis,
No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091739.pdf
EFTA00100628Set 9
2020-07-0210p2,869w
time the
previous statute was still running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis,
No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00100628.pdf
EFTA00076331Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,950w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076331.pdf
EFTA00080486Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,941w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00080486.pdf
EFTA00071674Set 9
2019-07-1228p13,950w
time the previous statute was still
running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018
WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071674.pdf