EFTA01097994Set 9
2011-10-1027p8,199w
obtain and use
the correspondence in litigation with the Government.
Fifth, Rule 410 makes plea bargaining statements admissible "in any proceeding wherein
another statement wade in the course ... Evidence. This claim also lacks merit.
First, the Court cannot create a "common law" plea bargaining privilege that would
overturn limits that Congress crafted in Rule 410. Congress extended protection ... privilege exists. While the defense attorneys frequently
allude to "constitutional considerations" that supposedly undergird plea bargain, the simple fact
remains that "there is no constitutional right to plea bargain." Weatherford
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01097994.pdf
EFTA00205728Set 9
2011-10-1027p8,165w
obtain and use
the correspondence in litigation with the Government.
Fifth, Rule 410 makes plea bargaining statements admissible "in any proceeding wherein
another statement wade in the course ... Evidence. This claim also lacks merit.
First, the Court cannot create a "common law" plea bargaining privilege that would
overturn limits that Congress crafted in Rule 410. Congress extended protection ... privilege exists. While the defense attorneys frequently
allude to "constitutional considerations" that supposedly undergird plea bargain, the simple fact
remains that "there is no constitutional right to plea bargain." Weatherford
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205728.pdf
EFTA01081982Set 9
2012-04-1927p8,102w
obtain and use
the correspondence in litigation with the Government.
Fifth, Rule 410 makes plea bargaining statements admissible "in any proceeding wherein
another statement made in the course ... Evidence. This claim also lacks merit.
First, the Court cannot create a "common law" plea bargaining privilege that would
overturn limits that Congress crafted in Rule 410. Congress extended protection ... privilege exists. While the defense attorneys frequently
allude to "constitutional considerations" that supposedly undergird plea bargain, the simple fact
remains that "there is no constitutional right to plea bargain." Weatherford
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081982.pdf
EFTA01122989Set 9
2011-08-12113p33,117w
begin with, the Supreme Court has recognized fol
21 long time that plea bargaining is an essential part of the
22 administration of justice. It all goes back ... duties and obligations on lawyers dealing with this
6 plea bargaining process. And as a result of that, the courts
7 and the rules have added sanctions -- excuse me, safeguards ... protect us because of communications made during the course c:
9 this plea bargaining process. And I think that is really wha:
10 we trying to get to here. There
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01122989.pdf
EFTA00211718Set 9
2007-04-2432p10,140w
gave victims "[t]he right
to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement."
Section 113(a), Pub. L. No. 114-22, 129 Stat ... addition of a new provision requiring prosecutors to timely inform crime
victims of a plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement illustrates that Congress believed the
pre-existing version ... encompass those subjects.
Further, Congress's specific reference to plea bargains and deferred prosecution
agreements (DPA), but not non-prosecution agreements (NPA), is telling. "DPA's differ from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211718.pdf
EFTA00591461Set 9
2017-06-0233p10,820w
gave victims "[t]he right
to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement."
Section 113(a), Pub. L. No. 114-22, 129 Stat ... addition of a new provision requiring prosecutors to timely inform crime
victims of a plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement illustrates that Congress believed the
pre-existing version ... encompass those subjects.
Further, Congress's specific reference to plea bargains and deferred prosecution
agreements (DPA), but not non-prosecution agreements (NPA), is telling. "DPA's differ from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00591461.pdf
EFTA00799825Set 9
2017-06-0632p10,748w
gave victims "[t]he right
to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement."
Section 113(a), Pub. L. No. 114-22, 129 Stat ... addition of a new provision requiring prosecutors to timely inform crime
victims of a plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement illustrates that Congress believed the
pre-existing version ... encompass those subjects.
Further, Congress's specific reference to plea bargains and deferred prosecution
agreements (DPA), but not non-prosecution agreements (NPA), is telling. "DPA's differ from
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00799825.pdf