""Pont Scheme"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"Pont Scheme"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00612483Set 9

2015-10-2035p8,537w

abuse of process; and (4) fraud. Epstein's complaint set forth details of a Pont scheme that Edwards, Rothstein, and others perpetrated through their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler ... news, and on the internet were legion about the implosion of RRA, the Pont Scheme perpetrated at that firm, and the misuse in the Ponzi Scheme of certain civil cases ... used to defraud investors out of millions of dollars and to fund the RRA Pont Scheme. In November 2009, I also became aware of news stories that as a result

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00612483.pdf

EFTA00081180Set 9

2010-03-1740p13,196w

1603b§ Filed 04/u44/11 Page 34 Ot 3V have run a giant Pont scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely ... been alleged that among other cases that Rothstein used to lure investors into his Pont scheme were the cases against Epstein that were being handled by Bradley J. Edwards ... have joined RRA had he been aware that Scott Rothstein was running a giant Pont scheme at the firm. Edwards left RRA shortly after learning of Rothstein's fraudulent scheme

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00081180.pdf

EFTA00811809Set 9

2018-08-2251p13,267w

Epstein knowingly and intentionally utilized funds he fraudulently diverted and obtained from this massive Pont scheme for his own personal use to support a lavish lifestyle. All of Epstein ... unfair practices. While Plaintiffs and the Class realized the depth and breadth of the Pont scheme following Hoffenberg's conviction and the several related civil lawsuits, Defendants' involvement was purposefully ... Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is an uncharged co-conspirator in connection with the fraudulent Pont schemes described herein. Defendant Epstein resides at 9 East 71st Street, New 3 EFTA00811812 Case

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00811809.pdf

EFTA00808205Set 9

2014-05-1917p4,342w

misused for purposes unrelated to the litigation in order to lure investors into the Pont Scheme is the fact that on July 24, 2009, Edwards filed a two hundred thirty ... case files shown at the offices of RRA to potential investors in the Pont Scheme. Edwards admitted in his March 23, 2010 deposition that there were between

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808205.pdf

EFTA00724224Set 9

2009-12-0945p12,401w

Page 2 of 6 ftumoote Much of the suit is a rehash of the Pont scheme allegations, and how Rothstein would talk up all the victims his firm represented that ... that Epstein was willing to pay as a guise to lure investors into his Pont' scheme. Epstein, represented by Robert Critton, Jr. of West Palm Beach's Burman Critter,. linnet

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00724224.pdf

EFTA00205964Set 9

2011-07-264p2,160w

Attorney's Office in Fort Lauderdale initiated an investigation into a Pont scheme operated by Scott Rothstein through his law firm. As part of his Ponzi scheme, Rothstein told investors

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205964.pdf

EFTA00802452Set 9

1997-03-0425p6,896w

formulaic and conclusory terms that Plaintiffs and the Class "reasonably relied upon the Pont scheme" (Compl. ¶¶ 88, 123), there are no factual allegations describing this reliance (or, for that matter

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802452.pdf

EFTA01100999Set 9

should have known Rothstein was utilizing RRA as a front for the massive Pont scheme . . . ." Complaint at 26 (emphasis added). Among other problems, this fallback negligence position suffered the fatal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100999.pdf

EFTA01112075Set 9

2009-11-0157p27,919w

with respect to investigation of Adler as an alleged co-conspirator in the Pont scheme directly overlap with many of the issues raised in this case. EFTA01112084 Case No.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMDAG

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112075.pdf

EFTA01100608Set 9

2011-04-0830p8,889w

that a managing partner at his law firm would be involved in an unprecedented Pont scheme. Scott Rothstein deceived not only Edwards but also more than 60 other reputable lawyers

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100608.pdf

EFTA00724098Set 9

2010-04-1616p3,535w

could avoid ad. risers that Scherer and his team allege becoming victims of a Pont scheme. He placed clients in Rothstein Investments. said he Milt have much advice to offer

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00724098.pdf

EFTA00726198Set 9

attorneys for investors who lost millions of dollars in the Scott Rothstein's Pont scheme. But a special master will be ap- pointed to review the documents beforehand to ensure

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726198.pdf

EFTA01126110Set 9

doesn't care about and I know the kinds 2 involved in a Pont scheme. I -- me and your client, 2 of things that he has done in the past

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01126110.pdf

EFTA01079863Set 9

delicate bargaining with others involved mabon necessary to his carrying out his Li the Pont scheme and at the law firm responsibiiities.' the response reads who are targets of federal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079863.pdf

EFTA01356141Set 10

2010-02-011p753w

February 1. 2010. The counts against Bailey charge that he engaged in a "Pont" scheme from about January 2000 to December 2010 to defraud investors of more than $13 million

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01356141.pdf

EFTA01112644Set 9

2010-06-0461p16,854w

them to Mean aal0(11) primarob ea wonder money end destroy evWenat of his Pont; scheme. lin a* -a'-222112) iltssolist2S41121) this comes after the first sealed document was thed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112644.pdf

EFTA01356201Set 10

2010-02-011p753w

February 1. 2010. The counts against Bailey charge that he engaged in a "Pont" scheme from about January 2000 to December 2010 to defraud investors of more than $13 million

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01356201.pdf

EFTA01734809Set 10

defeats bargaining with others involved maton necessary to his carrying out his in the Pont scheme and at the law firm responsffoilities; the response read& who are targets of federal

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01734809.pdf

EFTA00738123Set 9

2009-07-262p1,430w

Edward Jay Epstein Medoff did not share the credit for perpetrating the biggest Pont Scheme in the annals of crime. After his arrest on December Ilth 2008 he insisted

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00738123.pdf

EFTA00808816Set 9

2009-12-0738p7,270w

issue as stated fails to tie causation to Rothstein's operation of the Pont scheme. It is Edwards's position that failure to limit the issue in this

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808816.pdf

Page 1

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

October 2015

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset23 total

Set 9

20

Set 10

3