EFTA00221703Set 9
2009-04-028p5,062w
RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re- discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP
spondents. Rule 1.280(6)(1).
No. 97-82.
(3) Pretrial Procedure ... U.S.C.A.
West Headnotes 13981; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's
F.S.A. RCP Rule 1280(b)(1).
(I) Pretrial Procedure 307A rii:=D31 *1076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher ... reason- W. SHARP. Judge.
ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.
West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(bX1). Bales and Shumate petition this court for a writ of
certiorari
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221703.pdf
EFTA00222134Set 9
1997-10-108p5,067w
RU2ZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re- discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP
spondents. Rule 1.280(b)(1).
No. 97.82.
PI Pretrial Procedure 307A ... U.S.C.A. §
West Headnotes 13981; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's
F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).
(1) Pretrial Procedure 307A te=;•31 *1076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher ... reason- W. SHARP, Judge.
ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.
West's F.S.A. RCP Rule I .280(b)(1). Batas and Shumate petition this court for a writ
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222134.pdf
EFTA01070501Set 9
2009-02-2332p10,787w
trial, if It Would load to
discovery of relevant evidence. West's P.S.A. RCP
Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re-
spondents. Rule ... West Headnotes 13961; West's FS.A. §{1 772.014, 796.09; West's
F.S.A. RCP Rule 1280(*(1).
*1076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher Lind-
D3 Pretrial Procedure 307A ... admissi Baths and Shumate petition this court for a writ of
West's P.S.A. RCP Rule 12B0(6)(1). certiorari to review certain portions of the lower
court's order
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01070501.pdf
EFTA01070407Set 9
2009-02-1344p15,146w
Kimb
v. would be inadmissible at
of relev ant evide nce. West 's P.S.A . RCP
etc., Re- discovery
Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., Rule 1.280(6)0).
spondents ... U.S.C.A. §
772.0 14, 796.09; West's
West Headnotes 13981; West's P.S.A. §§
FS.A. RCP Rule 1280 (b)(1 ).
her Fisher Lind-
e 307A eza3 1 *1076 Richard E. Johnson ... ably calculated to lead to Bales and Shumate petition this court
West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.220(b)(1). certiorari to review certain portions
of the lower
a motion
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01070407.pdf
EFTA01070533Set 9
2009-07-2041p13,997w
Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re- discovery of relevant evidence. Westb P.S.A. RCP
spondents. Rule 1.280(6)(1).
No. 97-82.
83] Pretrial Procedure 307A ... West's F.S.A. §6 772.014, 796.09; West's
West Headnotes
frSA. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).
Lind-
co Pretrial Procedure 307A C=>31 41076 Richard E. Johnson and Heather Fisher ... Balm and Shumate petition this court for a writ of
West's RSA. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). certiorari to review certain portions of the lower
court's order which
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01070533.pdf
EFTA00722688Set 9
2009-04-1037p6,331w
potential
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE IN- cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule
SURANCE CO., Petitioner, 1.280(b)(1).
v. '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman,
Gary ... certiorari petition urging that the discovery re-
pending case. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). quest was not only unduly burdensome and over-
broad, but also constituted
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00722688.pdf
EFTA00614418Set 9
2009-04-1037p6,240w
potential
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE IN- cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule
SURANCE CO., Petitioner, 1.280(b)(1).
v. '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman,
Gary ... certiorari petition urging that the discovery re-
pending case. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). quest was not only unduly burdensome and over-
broad, but also constituted
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614418.pdf
EFTA00222188Set 9
2008-01-3111p2,519w
only possibility for valid service was service under
New York rules of procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC I. Taughannock Aviation
Corp ... federal rules do), service was effective only in accordance with New York
procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC, 2008 WL 305103, at *4 (resolving parties'
dispute concerning the intended method
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222188.pdf