EFTA00616426Set 9
2007-04-184p1,062w
Airfare Vessel Supplies & Delivery
Dates Description Meals Per Diem Prep Small Equip Fees
4/18/2007 Rampino to Ireland Yard Pre Buy # 1 76.33 160.28 1,060.50
5/8/2007 Rampino to Ireland Yard ... with receipts 2,479.91
3 days berryhill, 5/21, 22 and 23 225.00
3 days rampino, 5/21, 22 and 23 225.00
3 days weir, 5/21.22 and 23 225.00
6 days rampino ... Payment to "Pablo" Paul Schack 54.48 67.50 276.57
Paid out by Rampino, repairs, supplies, zip lock bags 48.62 4,581.06 4,598.72
6/2/2007 Pablo Ft. Laud to Myrtle Beach
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00616426.pdf
EFTA00792569Set 9
39p7,774w
People u. Mingo,
12 .3d 563 (2009) 18
People u. Rampino,
55 .3d 348 (1st Dep't 2008) 30
People u. Rhodehouse ... deem
remand necessary to recalculate Appellant's risk assessment level. See, e.g., People
v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008); Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V. u.
Eastbrook
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792569.pdf
EFTA00792343Set 9
57p11,385w
People v. Miranda,
24 A.D.3d 909 (3d Dep't 2005) 47
People v. Rampino,
55 A.D.3d 348 (1st Dep't 2008) 43
People u. Redcross,
54 A.D.3d ... been
legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People
v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding
resentencing matter to a different Justice where
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792343.pdf
EFTA00181023Set 9
124p12,224w
People u. Miranda,
24 A.D.3d 909 (3d Dep't 2005) 47
People v. Rampino,
55 A.D.3d 348 (1st Dep't 2008) 43
People v. Redcross,
54 A.D.3d ... been
legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People
v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding
resentencing matter to a different Justice where
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00181023.pdf
EFTA01168858Set 9
39p7,780w
People u. Mingo,
12 N.Y.3d 563 (2009) 18
People u. Rampino,
55 A.D.3d 348 (1st Dep't 2008) 30
People u. Rhodehouse,
77 A.D.3d ... deem
remand necessary to recalculate Appellant's risk assessment level. See, e.g., People
v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008); Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V. u.
Eastbrook
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01168858.pdf
EFTA01077101Set 9
61p12,214w
People u. Miranda,
24 A.D.3d 909 (3d Dep't 2005) 47
People u. Rampino,
55 A.D.3d 348 (1st Dep't 2008) 43
People u. Redcross,
54 A.D.3d ... been
legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People
v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding
resentencing matter to a different Justice where
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01077101.pdf
EFTA00603264Set 9
2010-08-1657p11,344w
been
legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v.
Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349, 865 N.Y.S.2d 77, 78 (1st Dept 2008)
(remanding resentencing matter
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603264.pdf
EFTA01085764Set 9
33p6,903w
necessary to recalculate Appellant's risk assessment level. See, e.g., People u.
29
EFTA01085792
Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008); Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V. v.
East
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085764.pdf