Epstein Files Search

EFTA00622245Set 9

2011-07-015p1,304w

COHN In Re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS OF THE RAZORBACK VICTIMS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Razorback Victims' Motion for Issuance of Writ ... Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum [DE 136], the Razorback Victims' Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Motion Altering or Amending Order Granting the Motions of the Trustee and Jeffrey Epstein to Issue ... Morse's Response [DE 139/140], Morse Operations, Inc.'s Response [DE 141], and the Razorback Victims' Omnibus Reply [DE 142]. The Court has carefully considered all of these filings

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00622245.pdf

EFTA00805367Set 9

2018-03-0822p7,118w

clearly demonstrates that this voluntary production constituted a waiver. Because Edwards and the Razorback victims' interests were not aligned in any way, and in fact were adversarial in every ... consider. ii. The Common Interest Doctrine Does Not Apply Because Edwards and the Razorback Victims were Adversaries and their Interests were in No Way Aligned. Edwards tries to avoid ... obvious waiver that occurred by asserting that he and the Razorback victims had aligned interests vis-a-vis Epstein. It takes but one moment of considering this argument to realize

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805367.pdf

EFTA01082366Set 9

2012-02-1310p2,908w

Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2012 Page 2 of 10 and Razorback Funding, LLC ("Razorback Victims") (DE 119], along with the Government's Reply [DE 124] and the Trustee's Reply ... parties. As for parties who participated in the first deposition, such as the Razorback victims [DE 119], the Trustee contends that further participation would open the door to several other ... parties who participated in the first deposition to seek additional involvement. The Razorback victims only seek further participation if their opponents in their private actions, the Insurers, are allowed

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01082366.pdf

EFTA01114325Set 9

2011-11-288p2,240w

Morse Operations, Inc.'s Response and Supplemental Response [DE's 57 and 62], Razorback Victims' Response [DE 63], Counsel for Scott Rothstein's Response [DE 64], TD Bank ... deposition are those parties facing an early 2012 trial date in state court, the Razorback Victims and Gilbraltar. These parties argue that in setting its trial schedule, the state court

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01114325.pdf

EFTA01082728Set 9

2012-06-04133p26,908w

representing 23 seven individuals and entities who are part of the 24 Razorback victim group, specifically Viceroy Global 25 Investments, Inc., Concorde Capital, Inc., FRIEDMAN. LOMBARDI & OLSON EFTA01082733 Page

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01082728.pdf

EFTA00794277Set 9

2018-03-0221p6,249w

whole world." See infra. Likewise, no "common interest" protection exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly not aligned with Edwards. This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00794277.pdf

EFTA01114378Set 9

2011-07-019p2,548w

Trustee's Response [DE 18], the Responses of Gilbraltar, TD Bank, Razorback Victims, and Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP ("Platinum") [DE 19, 22-24], and the Government's Reply

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01114378.pdf

EFTA01130121Set 9

2011-07-0110p2,597w

Trustee's Response [DE 18J, the Responses of Gilbraltar, TD Bank, Razorback Victims, and Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP ("Platinum") (DE 19, 22-24], and the Government's Reply

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01130121.pdf