EFTA00801596Set 9
35p24,676w
Jeffrey Epstein's 20 MR. SCAROLA: If we are working with
22 revised omnibus motion in ',mine. Is that 21 the witness list -- I mean with the exhibit
22 correct ... number nine. approach, I would like to give Your Honor
20 The revised omnibus motion in limine, :0 what was provided to my office from
11 identified examples
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801596.pdf
EFTA00807068Set 9
2017-11-293p459w
individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
REVISED OMNIBUS MOTION IN LIMINE
SECTION C (DEROGATORY ADJECTIVES)
THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing ... 12/5/17 Tr. 202:11-203:3), upon Section C (Derogatory
Adjectives) of the Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") [D.E. 1070]. The Court, having reviewed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00807068.pdf
EFTA00805475Set 9
2017-11-108p1,925w
December 7, 2017 hearings. (D.E. 1086.)
2. In his November 17, 2017, Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, Epstein asked the
Court to exclude certain trial testimony and evidence irrelevant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805475.pdf
EFTA00805158Set 9
2018-01-0531p6,526w
period December 7, 2009
through the present.
In his November 17, 2017, Revised Omnibus Motion in Limine, Epstein asked the Court
to exclude testimony or evidence that Epstein settled prior
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805158.pdf