""Rule 26.2"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

16 results for “"Rule 26.2"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00096232Set 9

2019-08-0116p5,202w

defendant." V. Jencks Material Pursuant to the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and Rule 26.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Mr. Epstein requests that the government provide

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00096232.pdf

EFTA00016136Set 8

2019-08-0116p5,191w

defendant." V. Jencks Material Pursuant to the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and Rule 26.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Mr. Epstein requests that the government provide

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00016136.pdf

EFTA00015865Set 8

2021-05-049p2,792w

witness," Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(h), explaining that such issues are governed by Rule 26.2. The diary is a set of recorded statements by Minor Victim ... extent it should be produced, that production is governed by Rule 16, Rule 26.2, Brady, and Giglio, but not Rule 17. See, e.g., United States v. Carton

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015865.pdf

EFTA00070837Set 9

2021-03-1241p13,013w

Dauber! hearing of Dr. Rocchio, and the Government has not to date received any Rule 26.2 disclosures from Dr. Dietz, or even a complete bibliography of the sources cited ... held after the defense's response to this motion and after all necessary Rule 26.2 disclosures are made. 25 EFTA00070865 II. CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY ... requests that it be conducted after receiving the defense response and after all necessary Rule 26.2 disclosures have been made. 32 EFTA00070872 be limited to those as to which there

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070837.pdf

EFTA01125545Set 9

2009-03-1515p7,691w

right under the Due Process Clause, protected through various provisions of Rule 32 and Rule 26.2, to "thorough adversarial testing," through notice and the opportunity to challenge any information that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01125545.pdf

EFTA01091403Set 9

2009-04-3074p36,721w

Process Clause." This right is protected through various provisions of Rule 32 and Rule 26.2, which require notice in the presentence report; the opportunity to investigate, object and present contrary

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf

EFTA00078646Set 9

2021-11-1916p4,502w

prospective witness," as the production of any such statements is governed by Rule 26.2. Fed.. Crim. P. 17(h). Many of the documents Maxwell seeks are statements

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078646.pdf

EFTA00022504Set 8

2021-04-293p913w

confer regarding a proposed schedule for defense disclosure of witness statements pursuant to Rule 26.2? Or if you would prefer to confer by email, would you please let us know

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00022504.pdf

EFTA00028927Set 8

Plaintiff has employed entity. The law enforcement entity, categorical logging pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.2(c). Email and letter David Boles, Stan S David Boles, This categorical entry

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028927.pdf

EFTA01079520Set 9

Southern District of New York v. Maxwell 15-cv-07433-RWS ***Per Local Rule 26.2, the following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. DATE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079520.pdf

EFTA00155647Set 9

2021-12-102p277w

have also provided a hyperlink to a Sharefile containing the defense disclosures under Rule 26.2. Sincerely, Is/ Christian R. Everdell Christian R. Everdell cc: All counsel of record (by email

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00155647.pdf

EFTA00156482Set 9

2021-12-102p299w

have also provided a hyperlink to a Sharefile containing the defense disclosures under Rule 26.2. Sincerely, Is/ Christian R. Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00156482.pdf

EFTA00029138Set 8

2021-04-292p474w

confer regarding a proposed schedule for defense disclosure of witness statements pursuant to Rule 26.2? Or if you would prefer to confer by email, would you please let us know

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029138.pdf

EFTA00091353Set 9

2014-12-3024p10,201w

require information on any privilege log above and beyond the requirements of Local Civil Rule 26.2. 3 EFTA00091355 SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091353.pdf

EFTA00621693Set 9

Southern District of New York Env. Maxwell 15-cv-07433-RWS ***Per Local Rule 26.2, the following privileges are asserted pursuant to British law, Colorado law and NY law. DATE

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00621693.pdf

EFTA00022486Set 8

2021-04-292p467w

confer regarding a proposed schedule for defense disclosure of witness statements pursuant to Rule 26.2? Or if you EFTA00022486 would prefer to confer by email, would you please

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00022486.pdf

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

August 2019

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset16 total

Set 8

6

Set 9

10