Epstein Files Search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

April 2009

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset5 total

Set 8

1

Set 9

4

5 results for “"Rule I7(c"”

EFTA01091403

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

Set 9

2009-04-3074p36,721w

c. Any "reasonable procedure" cannot infringe on the defendant's rights 41 B. Rule I7(c)(3) 42 1. Before the Amendment 42 2. After the Amendment 43 3. Constitutional ... Rule 12.1(b) appears to alter the right to reciprocal discovery alibi cases. • Rule I7(c)(3) requires a court order for a subpoena for documents containing "personal or confidential

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf

EFTA00076468Set 9

2018-06-1320p6,187w

relevant, they are hearsay, and hcnce their production is not appropriate pursuant to Rule I7(c). See, e.g., Boyle, 2009 WL 484436, at *2. Accordingly, with respect to Request

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076468.pdf

EFTA00104703Set 9

2021-04-276p1,661w

should nonetheless order the boots' production to the defense. The argument is meritless. Rule I7(c) is not the proper mechanism for discovery from third parties where the sought-after

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104703.pdf

EFTA00015859Set 8

2021-04-276p1,662w

should nonetheless order the boots' production to the defense. The argument is meritless. Rule I7(c) is not the proper mechanism for discovery from third parties where the sought-after