EFTA01116869Set 9
81p40,653w
such trusts offshore, and the changes in domestic law reverse a long-
standing American rule under which the asset-protection features of
Assistant Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University ... their assets from creditors.
This article examines the theoretical underpinnings of the
traditional American rule concerning creditors' rights in trusts
established for the settlor's own benefit. Under the traditional ... rule, a
creditor of a settlor is entitled to reach the assets of a trust for the
settlor's own benefit even though, in the case of a discretionary trust
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01116869.pdf
EFTA00583389Set 9
2013-06-1819p6,057w
Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169).
3
EFTA00583391
A. The Applicability of Rule 410.
Any assessment of the merits of the intervenors' contentions must begin with an
understanding ... Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399, 1407 (2012).
In Lafler and Frye, the Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to effective
assistance of counsel "extends to the plea bargaining ... persons under investigation for, or charged with, crimes are terribly at odds with
any ruling which exposes those negotiations to public scrutiny (or to the scrutiny of later
litigation adversaries
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583389.pdf
EFTA00210695Set 9
2008-07-0721p7,074w
JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO
RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CONFORM TO EXISTING EVIDENCE
AND TO ADD JANE ... victims"), by and through
undersigned counsel, to file this protective motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
I5(a)(2) to amend the petition that they have filed ... With regard to amending to add new victims, the Government has argued that Rule 15
(addressing amending pleadings) rather than Rule 21 (addressing joinder of parties) is the
applicable rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210695.pdf
EFTA01189737Set 9
2013-01-0218p6,005w
however, the Puerto Rican tax incentives must be understood in light of existing
US rules, which are very effective in ensuring the integrity of the US tax system
on built ... Incentives
for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico
EFTA01189740
The Puerto Rican Tax Rules for US Individuals Who Become
Residents of Puerto Rico
In January 2012, Puerto Rico passed ... Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"), however, provides special rules for an "individual who is a bonafide
MAYERBROWN I3
EFTA01189741
resident" of Puerto Rico.12 Under these special
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01189737.pdf
EFTA01288997Set 10
2016-12-31204p88,660w
Footnotes
Noncovered under the cost basis rules as defined below.
Securities acquired before 2011 or in retirement accounts are generally not subject to the new cost basis reporting rules ... therefore, considered snoncovered." under the new cost basis reporting rules, and marked or denoted as such.
All other securities in this section are securities which are 'covered" under ... cost basis reporting rules. Securities which are "covered under the new cost basis reporting rules are defined as non-retirement,
US taxpayers securities which have been acquired on or alter
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01288997.pdf
EFTA00800173Set 9
2010-04-0519p6,165w
THERETO
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned
counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby
requests that this Court ... Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
EFTA00800174
Florida Law permits litigants ample latitude in discovery. Rule 1.280 of the Florida
Rules of Civil Procedure memorializes this broad scope, and provides that ... seeks to strike the objections improperly made by Edwards by his assertion
of privilege. Rule 1.280(5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure delineates the requisites one
must follow
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800173.pdf
EFTA02335898Set 11
2015-07-0651p13,383w
such as the privacy rights of non-party victims, grand jury secrecy under Federal Rule
of Criminal Procedure 6(e),' and the attorney-client, work product, deliberative process, and
investigative ... whether any otherwise non-privileged documents are relevant to
Petitioners' CVRA case. Specific rulings as to the submitted documents are found in the Table
appended to this Opinion and Order ... raise several general objections to the Government's privilege logs. They
In a previous ruling, the Court noted that Plaintiffs formally requested the release of
grand July materials
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335898.pdf
EFTA00070837Set 9
2021-03-1241p13,013w
intended to be applied to the context of this case—unreliable.
B. Legal Standard
Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides:
5
EFTA00070845
If scientific, technical, or other ... Specifically, in Daubert, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Rules of
Evidence "assign to the trial judge the task of ensuring that an expert's testimony both rests ... government experts." United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d 56, 148 (2d Cir. 2003).
Applying Rule 702, the Court must determine whether the expert's reasoning and
methodology underlying his testimony
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070837.pdf
EFTA00806036Set 9
2018-02-0629p11,144w
Investor to sell, transfer or
otherwise dispose of the Interest; and (viii) that Rule 144 under the Securities Act is unlikely to
be available as a basis for exemption from ... date
hereof, that it is not subject to any "bad actor" disqualifications described in Rule 506(d)(1)(i) to
(viii) under the Securities Act (a "Disqualifying Event"), except ... Disqualifying Event
covered by Rule 506(d)(2) or (d)(3) under the Securities Act.
(i) Investment Company Act Representations. Except as otherwise disclosed
to the Partnership in writing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00806036.pdf
EFTA00039689Set 9
2021-05-28101p30,418w
result of the foregoing, Aegis willfully 2 violated Exchange Act Section 17(a) and Rule 17a-8
thereunder. RESPONDENT Aegis is a dually-registered investment adviser and broker-dealer with ... aided and abetted and caused Aegis' violations of
Exchange Act Section 17(a) and Rule 17a-8 thereunder and Eide was a cause of Aegis' violations.
vo.vw sec gov
Stetson ... Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, the
Company desires to issue and sell to each Purchaser, and each Purchaser, severally
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00039689.pdf
EFTA00011221Set 8
1996-04-2330p8,619w
SUMMARY
• The principle against the extradition of French nationals does not constitute a binding
rule of international law and is not considered a constitutional principle under French
law.
• The extradition ... requested person has consented to extradition, the
Investigating Chamber must deliver its ruling no later than 14 working days after the
- 75017 paris — fax. 2
www.wjavocats.com palais C1652
EFTA00011223
William ... opinion to
extradition, which is not subject to appeal. Following the Investigating Chamber's
ruling, there is no specified time frame within which the government must issue an
extradition decree
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00011221.pdf
EFTA00606588Set 9
2015-04-1516p4,884w
support of their CVRA claims, this order is not
intended to operate as a ruling on the relevance or admissibility of
any particular piece of correspondence, a matter expressly reserved ... disclosure of the plea negotiations." Id. at 1008.
Specifically, the court held that "Federal Rule of Evidence 410 does not protect against the
discoverability of plea negotiations," and, even ... violations of the Act allegedly committed by the United States, not
`against' Epstein," whom Rule 410 protects. Id. at 1008. The court also rejected arguments that
the correspondence was protected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00606588.pdf
EFTA00216228Set 9
2008-11-256p3,174w
statute or court order. Nonetheless, Ms. Ferguson did refer
me to the relevant Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, specifically Rules ... EFTA00216228
Rule 4-7.4
Mr. Mermelstein's complaint specifically refers to Rule 4-7.4, so I will address that rule
first. As explained in my September 18th letter to Ethics ... Herman, with
a note explaining why the letter was sent directly to his client.
Rule 4-7.4 relates to "Direct Contact with Prospective Clients." The victims that were the
subject
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00216228.pdf
EFTA00216141Set 9
2008-11-256p3,151w
statute or court order. Nonetheless, Ms. Ferguson did refer
me to the relevant Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, specifically Rules ... EFTA00216141
Rule 4-7.4
Mr. Mermelstein's complaint specifically refers to Rule 4-7.4, so I will address that rule
first. As explained in my September 18th letter to Ethics ... Herman, with
a note explaining why the letter was sent directly to his client.
Rule 4-7.4 relates to "Direct Contact with Prospective Clients." The victims that were the
subject
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00216141.pdf
EFTA00612027Set 9
2010-04-3038p8,951w
showing of exhaustion.
Finally, I find that the subpoena is unduly burdensome under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(c). While Gallo has
narrowed its subpoena to the Henry ... This civil action is before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), the Rules of this Court, and by the Order [Doc. 192) of
the Honorable Thomas W. Phillips ... apply, that the deposition should still be quashed under the standards established by Rule 26(b)(2) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs oppose the motion, arguing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00612027.pdf
EFTA00104652Set 9
2021-07-1234p11,087w
curiam). This is something akin to a clear statement rule. Single-district plea
agreements are the norm. Nationwide, unlimited agreements are the rare exception. Applying
Annabi, panels of the Second ... concludes that the charges in the S1 superseding indictment are clear enough.
Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7, an indictment must contain "a plain,
concise, and definite written statement ... States. v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1113 (2d
Cir. 1975). In addition to dismissal, "Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
permits a defendant to seek
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104652.pdf