EFTA00175717Set 9
2008-03-0558p16,603w
filed by Jane Doe No. 3. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered:
05/22/2008)
05/29/2008 5 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane
Doe No. 3. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit ... Goldberger on behalf of
Jeffrey Epstein (Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008)
06/13/2008 7 RESPONSE to Motion re 5 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk
Against Defendant Jane ... Attachments: # I Affidavit of Richard Bamett)(Goldberger, Jack)
(Entered: 06/13/2008)
06/20/2008 a Defendant's MOTION to Stay by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 7/10/2008
(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
06/20/2008
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00175717.pdf
EFTA01118553Set 9
2011-09-0812p5,066w
case
07/29/11 Receipt and review of Order on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards' CEK 0.25
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein's Amended Complaint
07/29/11 Receipt and review of Order ... Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards' CEK 0.25 ±
Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages
07/29/11 Receipt and review of Order on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion ... date through online scheduling with Judge Crow's division for the hearing on Edwards'
Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages; draft
correspondence to Darren
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01118553.pdf
EFTA00187391Set 9
1998-03-3193p40,205w
award of costs in this case in the
amount of $3,525.86. Motion granted.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs mo- 1. Contracts e=147(2)
tion for attorney ... sublet to Fisher, the Government's possible sublease or assignment of the Prem-
motion for partial summary judgment on its ises. The proposed arrangement between
claim for ejectment is granted ... swear under oath that he never orally ap- I heard oral argument on the motions on
proved the sublet to Fisher. Fisher con- December 17, 1997. Collectively, Epstein
tends that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00187391.pdf
EFTA00614086Set 9
2011-09-1621p6,470w
UNITED STATES
JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR "LIMITED"
INTERVENTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred ... victims"), by and
through undersigned counsel, to oppose the motion of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for
"limited" intervention in this case under ... motion for "limited" intervention should be denied for three separate and
independent reasons. First, Epstein's motion is not timely. The victims very specifically advised
Epstein more than one year
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614086.pdf
EFTA00791869Set 9
2019-03-1527p6,343w
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857.8500
MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT
Docket Ntunber(s): 18-2868 Caption luse short Ski
Motion for. to Reconsider ... from: Hon. Robert W. Sweet, District Judge (S.D.N.Y.)
Please check appropriate boxes: FOR EMERGENCY MOTIONS, MOTIONS FOR STAYS AND
1NJUCTIONS PENDING APPEAL:
Has movant notified posing counsel (required by Local ... sought in this court? Yes MINo
Requested return date and explanation of emergency:
The motion requests that post argument orders be held in abeyance pending resolution
Opposing 1's position
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00791869.pdf
EFTA01407189Set 10
2016-10-12100p20,728w
appeal was
an
appropriate sanction for appellant's failure to file its brief.
OUTCOME: Motion to dismiss granted.
CORE TERMS: summary judgment, scheduling, reconsideration, deadline, weigh,
failure
to prosecute, designation ... lack of responsibility for its counsel's dilatory conduct
is not dispositive on
a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, because a client cannot always
avoid the
consequences ... Ordinarily, a claim, or defense, will be deemed meritorious when the
allegations of the
motion, if established, would support recovery by plaintiff or would
constitute a complete
defense.
EFTA01407223
Bankruptcy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01407189.pdf
EFTA00612250Set 9
2017-03-31158p38,362w
would like to see if
4 I can clarify my understanding.
5 In the motion to dismiss, I concluded, I think, that
6 what was at issue was the truth ... opinion.
9 Yesterday, we were discussing the redactions of the
10 intervention motion. I got the sense, perhaps wrongly, that
11 the plaintiff's position was that the defamation ... other
16 things that she sets forth in the Churcher articles, in the
17 motion to intervene, there are a whole series of other things
18 that are -- I mean
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00612250.pdf
EFTA00085098Set 9
2019-03-0618p7,254w
Westlaw citation is currently 2017 WL 1787934, 325 F.Supp.3d 428,
available. granted motions to intervene, but denied
United States Court of Appeals, Second requests to unseal. Intervenors appealed.
Circuit ... Cernovich Media,
Intervenors-Appellants, [21 district court abused its discretion in
v. denying motion to unseal filings related to
Plaintiff-Appellee, discovery motions.
v.
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant-Appellee: Pooler, Circuit ... circumstances, preserving
consideration in summary judgment accused's right to fundamental
motion are—as matter of fairness in jury selection process,
law—judicial documents to which protection of attorney-client
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00085098.pdf
EFTA00209236Set 9
2011-03-2120p5,563w
JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also ... through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a
Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to
relitigate ... public court file.
On March 21, 2011, the victims filed what was essentially a Motion For Summary
Judgment in this case, explaining why (in their view) the Government had violated
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209236.pdf
EFTA01248965Set 9
2015-02-2646p12,417w
Bench Conference Defense A torneYisl:
*: Motion to Strike Asst. State Atty[s]: 444A/NA 6C-l-(≤WLAVex 4-14-cy Aliov .2),W5AN
FomunNoness Log - 2005
6685L000-VLIM
EFTA01248984 ... from the United States District Court compelling the production, then you must file a motion
to quash the grand jury subpoena before the United States District Judge who empaneled ... order, and I can proceed before the United States District Judge by filing a motion to
'I do not know whether the grand jury proceedings have yet been transcribed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248965.pdf
EFTA00623075Set 9
2016-06-0140p11,688w
York
Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS
v.
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS
AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT MATERIALS
BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
Sigrid ... Plaintiff by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby files this
response to Defendant's Motion to Compel All Attorney-Client Communications and Attorney
Work Product Placed at Issue by Plaintiff ... Attorneys (DE 164). The motion should be
denied in its entirety.
INTRonticrioN
Defendant argues and two of her attorneys (Cassell and Edwards) have
somehow placed "at issue" her confidential attorney
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00623075.pdf
EFTA00183868Set 9
2008-08-2167p23,015w
Petitioners.
VE ORDER
ORDER TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND PROTECTI
ore tenus motion seeking the
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners'
United States Attorney's Office ... Southern District of Florida ("USAO") and Jeffrey Epste
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the
Motion, the arguments of the parties, and the record, it is
produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement,
Petitioners ... Motion is GRANTED. The USAO shall
ance with the following procedures:
including any modifications and addenda thereto, in accord
tion Agreement,
(a) The USAO shall produce a copy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00183868.pdf
EFTA00612483Set 9
2015-10-2035p8,537w
FOURTH DISTRICT
CASE NO. 4D14-2282
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS,
Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT
The appellee, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully moves for leave ... Shortly thereafter, oral argument was set for October 20, 2015.
4. Edwards filed a motion to cancel the oral argument, arguing that based upon
Fischer, this Court should summarily reverse ... additional brief extension of time for
filing Epstein's response to the motion to cancel oral argument, indicating that
Edwards' motion would be opposed based in part upon the tipsy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00612483.pdf
EFTA00092308Set 9
2019-03-0626p5,904w
Southern
District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) denying their respective
motions to unseal filings in a defamation suit. We conclude that the
' The Clerk of Court is directed ... Southern District of
New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) denying their respective motions
to unseal filings in a defamation suit. We conclude that the District
Court failed to conduct ... additional parties from
the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore
denied Dershowitz's motion as moot.5
The stricken allegations, however, quickly found their way into
the press, and several
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092308.pdf
EFTA01098037Set 9
2011-10-1421p6,534w
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OMNIBUS REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION
We clarify at the outset the plaintiffs' claim that they have ... plaintiffs
[DE 96] in response to Mr. Epstein's motion for limited intervention. Mr. Epstein's intervention is
timely, as of right and as a matter of discretion, and properly ... evidentiary use of letters and emails reflecting plea negotiations. The Court should
grant his motion for limited intervention.
I.
INTRODUCTION
For a number of years, Jeffrey Epstein endured intensive investigation
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098037.pdf
EFTA01085801Set 9
2014-02-0639p15,763w
CASE NO. 4D14-2282
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Appellee.
APPENDIX TO APPELLANT'S INITIAL BRIEF
1. Motion for Reconsideration dated February 6, 2014. A1-37
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy ... ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
Defendant,
COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS (EDWARDS), moves this Honorable Court to
reconsider the Court ... favor of the
Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (EPSTEIN), and in support of this motion would show:
1. The issue squarely presented by EPSTEIN'S Motion for Summary Judgment is
whether
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085801.pdf