EFTA02729635Set 11
2009-06-108p2,046w
Sarasota Herald Tribune, Div
See, e.g., Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein
Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);
Doe No. 4. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Pry. islet, tv Poor-in Case No. 08-
80381 (S.D ... Fla. 2008); C.M.A. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80811 (S.D. Fla. 2008)• Doe v. Epstein,
Case No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla 2008); Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02729635.pdf
EFTA02729582Set 11
2009-06-0115p3,490w
Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div
See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein.
Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);
Doe No. 4._vinstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 5 v, Epstein, Case No. 08-
80381 (S.D ... C.M.A. v. Epstein Case No. 08-80811 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe v. Epstein,
Case No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No, 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993 (S.D
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02729582.pdf
EFTA00183935Set 9
2008-07-02162p38,011w
Warrants
Closure. 16
2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did
Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing ... ases are pe
(A-1)5 At (S.D. Fla.
0 8 - 8 0 0 6 9
o. !
o e s E p s tein, Case ... followed.
0 ( D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 5 1. Epstein, Case No. 08-80381 (S.D. Fla. 2008);
. 1. Epstein, Case No. 08-80811 S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe'. Epstein, Case
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00183935.pdf
EFTA01070451Set 9
2009-07-2050p15,294w
Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Doe
No. 2 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
2009 WL 383330 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, 2009 WL 383286
(S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); and Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb.
12, 2009).
There is no reported case supporting Plaintiffs ... Venture 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves, 2009 WL 528251, *3
(S.D. Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v, Astrue 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and Smith
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01070451.pdf
EFTA01081829Set 9
2013-07-05101p27,839w
First Am. Compl. 32-33, Doe v. Epstein, Case No.
08-80893-CIV-MARRA (S.D. Fla.) ("assert[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey
Epstein, pursuant ... United States Government"); Compl. ¶119-20,. v.
Epstein, Case No. 09- --CIV-Cohn (S.D. Fla.) (asserting that plaintiff was "covered by"
provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the government ... party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D.
Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081829.pdf
EFTA00175521Set 9
2008-07-1868p22,246w
Jane Doe No. 2 I. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-CV-80119-KAM (S.D.
Fla. filed Feb. 6, 2Q08) (disclosing fact of Epstein's criminal sentence and incarceration ... Jane Doe No. 31 E tein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Mar. 5, 2008) (same); DE
30 in Jane Doe No. 4 I. Epsjein ... ICAM (S.D. Fla. filed Apr. 14, 2008) (same);
DE 28 in Jane Doe No. 5 I. Epstein, No. 08-80381-CV-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Apr. 14, 2008)
(same). Being
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00175521.pdf
EFTA00205624Set 9
2008-07-1137p11,998w
First Am. Compl. 1 32-33, Doe'. Epstein, Case No.
08-80893-CIV-MARRA (S.D. Fla.) ("assert[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey
Epstein, pursuant ... United States Government"); Compl. ¶¶ 19-20, L.M. •
Epstein, Case No. 09- 81092-CIV-Cohn (S.D. Fla.) (asserting that plaintiff was "covered by"
provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between ... other party in status quo"); Renfrowl First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D.
Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205624.pdf
EFTA01191873Set 9
2015-01-2140p13,998w
females who had sued Epstein (Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
(S.D. Fla.)). At that point, Dershowitz understood that counsel for many of Epstein's victims
believed ... deposition before this court in Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-
cv-80119-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the
scheduled deposition date ... S.D. Fla. 2011) (quoting Augustus v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 306 F.2d 862, 868 (5th Cir.1962)).
"If there is any doubt as to whether the allegations might be an issue
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01191873.pdf
EFTA01085266Set 9
19p5,390w
elevant-te
a claim for punitive damages. Lanc v. Capita! Acquisitions, 212 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla.
2005). Plaintiffs' request for non current financial information is irrelevant to a
puftitive-damages ... five-years-is-deemed
overly broad. Sec Lane v. Capital Acquisitions, 242 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla. 2005) ("[t]he
Couti howeverr dees-find-that-PlaietiffsLdiseevey-Fequests-afe-eveFbread-en-their ... five-year--Fequest,See
Lisne r. Capital Acquisitions, 212 F.R.B. 667 (S.D. Fla. 2005). This Request for
Produstien-is-vagEte-as-dcafled-sueh-that-I-am-unable-te-thaft
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085266.pdf
EFTA00230437Set 9
2010-12-1051p6,704w
Jane•Doe #2 v. United States, Case No.
08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.). OPR has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of
misconduct involving Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys ... Jane Doe #2 v. United States, Case
No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Jolmson (S.D. Fla.). OPR has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of
misconduct involving Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys ... Jane Doe #2 v. Untied
States, Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marrallohnson (S.D. Fla.). OPR has jurisdiction to investigate
allegations of misconduct involving Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00230437.pdf
EFTA00722059Set 9
2009-08-0629p7,965w
Rule 12(b)(6), (e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rule 7.1
(S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of dismissal, Defendant states:
The First Amended Complaint attempts to allege ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Doe
No. 2 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein,
2009 WL 383330 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, 2009 WL 383286
(S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); and Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb.
12, 2009).
There is no reported case supporting Plaintiff
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00722059.pdf
EFTA00201190Set 9
2009-03-1221p6,896w
Rule 12(b)(6), (e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rule 7.1
(S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of dismissal, Defendant states:
The First Amended Complaint attempts to allege ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Doe
No. 2 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein,
2009 WL 383330 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, 2009 WL 383286
(S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); and Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb.
12, 2009).
There is no reported case supporting Plaintiff
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00201190.pdf
EFTA00213246Set 9
2010-03-2929p9,525w
specified herein. Rule 12(b)(6),
Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Defendant further moves for
more definite statement and to strike. Rule ... Venture, 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves, 2009 WL 528251, *3 (S.D.
Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v. Astrue 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and Smith ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Doe No. 2
v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein 2009 WL
383330 (S.D. Fla
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213246.pdf
EFTA00207722Set 9
2010-03-2929p9,495w
specified herein. Rule 12(b)(6),
Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Defendant further moves for
more definite statement and to strike. Rule ... Venture, 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves, 2009 WL 528251, *3 (S.D.
Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v. Astrue 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and Smith ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Doe No. 2
v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein 2009 WL
383330 (S.D. Fla
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207722.pdf
EFTA00793920Set 9
2018-04-1127p8,166w
court); Growers Packing Co. v. Community Bank of Homestead, 134
B.R. 438, 444 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1991)(any implied power of bankruptcy courts to impose
sanctions for criminal contempt would ... pose serious constitutional questions); Walton v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 2009 WL 1905035 (S.D. Fla.)(no inherent authority to impose
sanctions [for criminal contempt)); In re WVF Acquisition ... Bankr. S.D.
Fla. 2009)("without further guidance from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States
6
114428178.1
EFTA00793925
Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6355 Filed 04/11/18 Page
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793920.pdf
EFTA01107356Set 9
9p2,606w
relevant to a claim for punitive damages. Lane v.
Capital Acquisitions, 242 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla. 2005). Plaintiffs' request for non-current
financial information is irrelevant to a punitive damages ... five years is deemed overly-burdensome. See Lane v. Capital Acquisitions,
242 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla. 2005) ("[t]he Court, however, does find that Plaintiffs'
discovery requests are overbroad ... relevant to a claim for
punitive damages. Lane v. Capital Acquisitions, 242 F.R.D. 667 (S.D. Fla. 2005). Not
sure about any other objection to this
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01107356.pdf
EFTA00207677Set 9
2006-07-2636p12,694w
predicate act violations.
Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2010); Local Gen. Rules 7.1, and 7.5 (S.D. Fla. 2010). In support
of his motion, Defendant states:
EFTA00207677
Case ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — Poe No. 2 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332
(S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383330 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, 2009 WL 383286 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); and Poe No. 5
v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); see also U.S. v. Scheidt, Slip
Copy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207677.pdf
EFTA01100005Set 9
2006-07-2643p14,726w
file suit.
Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2010); Local Gem Rules 7.1, and 7.5 (S.D. Fla. 2010). In support
of his motion, Defendant states:
Introduction
EFTA01100005
Jane ... Dismiss and For More Definite Statement — woe
Flo. 2 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 3 v. Epstein. 2009
WL 383330 (S.D. Fla ... Epstein, 2009 WL 383286 (S.D. Fla.
Feb. 12, 2009); and Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, 2009 WL 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009);
see also U.S. v. Scheidt, Slip Copy
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100005.pdf
EFTA00610600Set 9
2009-07-0822p4,664w
Davidson v. Capital One, N.A., No. 14-20478-CIV, 2014 WL 3767677 (S.D. Fla.
July 8, 2009). 1
DelMonico v. Traynor ... Fla. 1992) 3
Gainer v. Portfolio Recovery Assoc., LLC, 571 F.Supp.2d 1273 (S.D. Fla. 2008)2
Glenn v. Hoerner Boxes, Inc., 211 F.Supp. 9 (W.D. Ark. 1962). 10
Green ... Bureaus Investment Group No. II, LLC, No. 1:09-CV-20784, 2009 WL
1973476 (S.D. Fla. July 8, 2009). 2
Perl v. Omni Intl of Miami
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00610600.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
United States,
359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla. 2019) 14
Doe No. 1. v. United States,
749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176
Dowling v. United States ... United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, Inc.,
853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24
United States v. Forde,
740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim ... agreement
required. Doe I v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1212-13 (S.D. Fla. 2019). As the district
court noted, that appeal was rejected
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf