EFTA01091403Set 9
2009-04-3074p36,721w
Supp. 2d 737 (W.D.N.C. 2009); United States V. BP Products,
2008 WL 501321 •9 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008); United States v. Hunter, 2008 WL 53125 *7 (D. Utah ... Kimball, J.); United Stales v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 2007 WL 2274393 *2 (S.D. Tex.
Aug. 8, 2007); United States v. Satan. 2007 WL 951666.1 (D. Conn. Mar. 28.2007); United States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf
EFTA00207984Set 9
2011-05-0229p9,189w
before a charging instrument is
filed." United States. BP, 2008 WL 501321 at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008). The district
court then recognized that "[t]he CVRA states that ... United States
BP Products North American, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 (S.D. Tex. 2008)). Peterson, however,
found that on its particular facts the "conclusory allegations" in the victims' petition there
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207984.pdf
EFTA01144324Set 9
2015-04-1629p15,270w
Prods. N. Am. Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008
WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (denying request to reject plea agreement as remedy for
asserted violations of CVRA rights ... Prods. N. Am. Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at
*12 (S.D. Tex. 2008) ("The briefs have not cited cases addressing whether the CVRA requires
21
EFTA01144344
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01144324.pdf
EFTA00178057Set 9
2011-05-0290p23,378w
charging instrument is
filed." United States v. BP, 2008 WL 501321 at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008). The district
court then recognized that "[t]he CVRA states that ... United States v.
BP Products North American, Inc., 2008 WI, 501321 (S.D. Tex. 2008)). Peterson, however,
found that on its particular facts the "conclusory allegations" in the victims' petition there
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00178057.pdf
EFTA01098264Set 9
2011-05-0229p9,339w
charging instrument is
filed." United States v. BP, 2008 WL 501321 at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008). The district
court then recognized that "[t]he CVRA states that ... United States v.
BP Products North American, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 (S.D. Tex. 2008)). Peterson, however,
found that on its particular facts the "conclusory allegations" in the victims' petition there
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098264.pdf
EFTA01125545Set 9
2009-03-1515p7,691w
Tex. Feb. 21, 2008)
United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 2007 WL 2274393 *2 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2007)
United States v. Sacane, 2007 WL 951666 *1 (D. Conn
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01125545.pdf
EFTA00205691Set 9
2007-09-2414p4,152w
Prods N.
Am. Inc., No. 07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) ("There are clearly
rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205691.pdf
EFTA02505388Set 11
2015-04-084p1,019w
United States
<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Allbritton_et_al_v_UNI= ED_STATES_OF_AMERICA_Docket_No_415
cv00275_> , S.D. Tex., No. 4:15-cv-00275, complaint filed, 1/30/15).
The government's answer
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02505388.pdf
EFTA00205542Set 9
2011-01-0513p3,920w
United States. v. BP Products North America, Inc., 610
F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009). Instead, "[t]he purpose of the reasonable right to confer is
for victims
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205542.pdf
EFTA01074706Set 9
2015-09-0288p20,428w
Life Assur. Co. of
Canada, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60469, '23-24 (S.D. Tex. April 29, 2013) ("The Court can
discern no reason, grammatical or otherwise, why the last antecedent
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01074706.pdf
EFTA01081519Set 9
2013-06-1914p4,270w
United States v. BP Products North
America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 at * 11-15 (S.D. Tex. 2008)(unpub), citing 150 Cong. Rec. 52460,
54268 (daily ed. Apr 22, 2004)(statement
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081519.pdf
EFTA01081796Set 9
2013-06-1914p4,270w
United States v. BP Products North
America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 at * 11-15 (S.D. Tex. 2008)(unpub), citing 150 Cong. Rec. 52460,
54268 (daily ed. Apr 22, 2004)(statement
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081796.pdf
EFTA00221676Set 9
2008-09-2910p2,202w
efficiency. See, e.g., In re Enron Corp. Securities Litigation, 206 F.R.P. 427, 438 (S.D. Tex. 2002).
At the same time, there is no conceivable prejudice or confusion that would result
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221676.pdf
EFTA01134762Set 9
2011-09-2614p4,151w
Prods N.
Am. Inc., No. 07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) ("There are clearly
rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01134762.pdf
EFTA01081334Set 9
2011-09-2614p4,151w
Prods N.
Am. Inc., No. 07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) ("There are clearly
rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081334.pdf
EFTA00205830Set 9
2007-09-2414p4,126w
States" BP Prods N.
Am. Inc., No. 07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) ("There are clearly
rights under the CVRA that apply before
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205830.pdf