EFTA00726931Set 9
2010-07-0220p15,549w
Wash) 2008 US Dist LEXIS 83563 (criticized in
United States v Myers (2008, SD Fla) 591 F Supp 2d 1312, 21 FLW Fed D 473).
Defendant, as convicted sex offender ... Supp 2d 851 (criticized in United States v Myers (2008, SD Fla) 21 FLW Fed D 473).
Because federal prosecution under 18 USCS§ 2250 did not reach purely intrastate movement ... Stipp 2d 851 (criticized in
United States v Myers (2008, SD Fla) 21 FLW Fed D 473).
Defendant's indictment charging him with failure to register as sex offender under
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726931.pdf
whether it did
or did not breach CVRA rights of third parties — rely on SD Fla
pleadings in CVRA, law
4. NPA — practical — impossibility of undoing the NPA — cannot rescind ... Guidelines)
9. Objective — to have DOJ supervise if not endorse the SD Fla
commitment, expressed to court in 3771 case, that whatever the
CVRA decision by J Marra, it will ... honor its NPA commitments not to
prosecute JE and that the recusal of SD Fla will not cause the DOJ (or
the MD Fla) to deviate from their constitutional, contractual
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100378.pdf
EFTA00729060Set 9
2007-09-248p1,956w
filing of the Complaint
in Jane Doe 103 v Epstein 9:10cv80309-KAM (SD Fla) by the attorney
representative. The charges are clearly litigation related and are in direct
conflict ... reasonable, see, e.g., Red Bull GMBH v. Spacefuel Corp
EFTA00729064
(1:06cv20948-AJ)(SD Fla)(Court reduces rates charged to losing party in
litigation as being unreasonable)(CITE TO OTHER
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00729060.pdf
EFTA00729141Set 9
2007-09-248p1,956w
filing of the Complaint
in Jane Doe 103 v Epstein 9:10cv80309-KAM (SD Fla) by the attorney
representative. The charges are clearly litigation related and are in direct
conflict ... reasonable, see, e.g., Red Bull GMBH v. Spacefuel Corp
EFTA00729145
(1:06cv20948-AJ)(SD Fla)(Court reduces rates charged to losing party in
litigation as being unreasonable)(CITE TO OTHER
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00729141.pdf
EFTA00587729Set 9
2016-11-031p171w
pleadings re Fifth Amendment issues,
reading case law, review of all SDNY and SD Fla filings re Fifth Amendment issues,
review of underlying documents establishing validity of Fifth Amendment, review
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00587729.pdf
EFTA00725795Set 9
2010-02-113p1,131w
claim rights as a
beneficiary of that agreement, see Case No 10-80309 (SD Fla), Complaint, par 25-26,
thus requiring that civil counsel consider responsive motions that relate
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725795.pdf
EFTA00725792Set 9
2010-02-113p1,232w
claim rights as a
beneficiary of that agreement, see Case No 10-80309 (SD Fla), Complaint, par 25-26,
thus requiring that civil counsel consider responsive motions that relate
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725792.pdf
EFTA00725790Set 9
2010-02-112p977w
claim rights as a
beneficiary of that agreement, see Case No 10-80309 (SD Fla), Complaint, par 25-26,
thus requiring that civil counsel consider responsive motions that relate
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725790.pdf
EFTA00586230Set 9
2010-02-112p856w
claim rights as a
beneficiary of that agreement, see Case No 10-80309 (SD Fla), Complaint, par 25-26,
thus requiring that civil counsel consider responsive motions that relate
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00586230.pdf