EFTA00068207Set 9
2020-08-048p3,259w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00068207.pdf
EFTA00104598Set 9
2020-08-028p3,383w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, tinder Touhv
section 16.22(6), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhv does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhvs on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104598.pdf
EFTA00206900Set 9
2010-11-043p500w
preservation
purposes. This information will be kept confidential. If the USAO-SDFLA Lit Hold efforts are ever the subject of
discovery, we can redact the victim names...as was done ... Original counsel fon?
• Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution
Agreement
• Lilly Ann Sanchez, Counsel For Epstein
• Jack Goldberger, Counsel for Epstein
Palm ... United States Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve
documents and data relevant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206900.pdf
EFTA00099658Set 9
2020-08-049p3,465w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Toulzys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099658.pdf
EFTA00097904Set 9
2020-08-049p3,393w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Toni?),
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097904.pdf
EFTA00206925Set 9
2010-11-043p567w
preservation
purposes. This information will be kept confidential. If the USAO-SDFLA Lit Hold efforts are ever the subject of
discovery, we can redact the victim names...as was done ... counsel foa 9999
• Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution
Agreement
• Lilly Ann Sanchez, Counsel For Epstein
• Jack Goldberger, Counsel for Epstein
• Assistant ... United States Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve
documents and data relevant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206925.pdf
EFTA00087277Set 9
2020-05-226p2,721w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087277.pdf
EFTA00104392Set 9
2020-08-028p3,180w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(6), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Muhry does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104392.pdf
EFTA00206897Set 9
2010-11-043p701w
preservation
purposes. This information will be kept confidential. If the USAO-SDFLA Lit Hold efforts are ever the subject of
discovery, we can redact the victim names...as was done ... Original counsel for
• Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution
Agreement
• Lilly Ann Sanchez, Counsel For Epstein
• Jack Goldberger, Counsel for Epstein
EFTA00206898 ... United States Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve
documents and data relevant
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00206897.pdf
EFTA00077062Set 9
2020-06-087p2,805w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Toulzys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077062.pdf
EFTA00088103Set 9
2020-07-318p3,326w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Toukis on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088103.pdf
EFTA00088120Set 9
2020-08-049p3,452w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have
them, try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to ND0a for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section I6.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088120.pdf
EFTA00101882Set 9
2020-08-028p3,400w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have
them, try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00101882.pdf
EFTA00104400Set 9
2020-08-049p3,444w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them,
try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... Touhy Requests
I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhy
section 16.22(b), the responsible ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see
NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
From
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104400.pdf
EFTA00088111Set 9
2020-08-049p3,352w
make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have
them, try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena ... instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I
can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this.
EFTA00088114
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088111.pdf