EFTA00721999Set 9
2010-03-056p2,015w
rather than $150,000) under ex post
facto laws, see United States v. Scheidt, 2010 W.L. 144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010)
(indicating that the statute in effect at the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00721999.pdf
EFTA00233188Set 9
2009-09-0121p5,713w
rather than $150,000) under ex post
facto laws, see United States'. Scheidt, 2010 W.L. 144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010)
(indicating that the statute in effect at the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00233188.pdf
EFTA00189955Set 9
2010-03-056p2,043w
rather than $150,000) under ex post
facto laws, see United States'. Scheidt, 2010 W.L. 144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010)
(indicating that the statute in effect at the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00189955.pdf
EFTA00725792Set 9
2010-02-113p1,232w
post facto laws ($50,000 rather than $150,000), see United
States v Scheidt 2010 W.L. 144837 (ED Cal, 2010) (indicating that the statute in
effect at the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725792.pdf
EFTA00725795Set 9
2010-02-113p1,131w
post facto laws ($50,000 rather than $150,000), see United
States v Scheidt 2010 W.L. 144837 (ED Cal, 2010) (indicating that the statute in
effect at the time
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00725795.pdf