, 190 So. 3d 169, 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ("Strict compliance with
rule 1.440 is required and failure to adhere to it is reversible ... required and failure to adhere to it is reversible
error." Melbourne HMA, LIE v.
Schoof
, 190 So. 3d 169, 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
(emphasis added). See also Tucker