EFTA00076468Set 9
2018-06-1320p6,187w
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DATE FILED: St " - Mr
v. 15-CR-317 (KMW)
DEAN SKELOS and ADAM SKELOS, OPINION & ORDER
Defendants.
X
KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge ... Government has charged Defendants Adam Skelos and Dean Skelos with extortion in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951-52, with honest services fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C ... Document 323 Filed 05/17/18 Page 14 of 20
and/or Steven Swarzman "regarding Dean Skelos or Adam Skelos." (Gov't Glenwood Mot., Ex.
A, at 5, Ex. B, at 5.) Many
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00076468.pdf
EFTA00023938Set 8
2019-10-0714p4,964w
July 2018, following a jury trial, the Public Corruption Unit obtained convictions of Dean Skelos
the former New York State Senate Majority Leader, and his son. Adam Skelos, on charges ... bribery
and extortion. The proof at trial showed that Dean Skelos used his position to obtain more than
$300,000 in bribes and extortion payments that were made to Adam ... Skelos. Dean Skelos received a
sentence of 51-months imprisonment and Adam Skelos received a sentence of four years'
imprisonment.
Prosecuting Local Corruption
• Christopher St. Lawrence. the former Ramapo Town
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023938.pdf
EFTA01763721Set 10
2012-10-232p297w
From: on behalf of Senate Leader Dean Skelos and John
Catsimatidis <
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 7:24 PM
To: Dear Friend
Subject: Senate Leader Dean Skelos and John Catsimatidis ... Dear Friend
I hope you will consider joining Senate Majority leader Dean Skelos and me next Monday evening, October 29, 2012 to
support a rising <http://secure.campaigner.com/accountsmedia/12/125685/f0f4512680734cd8944f22c165c94122.jpg>
star ... think you will leave a fan.
Thank you,
John Catsimatidis
Majority Leader Dean Skelos
with cohost
John Catsimatidis
In support of
Assemblywoman
Nicole Malliotakis (R/NY 60)
Monday, October
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01763721.pdf
EFTA00104686Set 9
2021-04-279p2,731w
impeachment material does not
become relevant until after the witness testifies. United States v. Skelos, No. 15-CR-317
(ICMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 (S.D.N.Y ... those
documents would become relevant only after a witness testifies. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538,
at *2. Maxwell's argument that the documents are relevant because their impeachment value ... parte Rule 17(c)
subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if justified. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *8
8
EFTA00104693
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104686.pdf
EFTA00090223Set 9
2021-11-188p2,431w
Supp. 3d 237, 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted); see United
States v. Skelos, No. 15 Cr. 317, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 ("The materials sought under Rule ... evidence pursuant to Rule 17(c) is not required
until after the witness testifies," Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2, in this case the Government
expects each of the Minor ... defendant, it should only release those records that comply with the Nixon
standard. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 ("To avoid delay in trial, courts sometimes require
production
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090223.pdf
EFTA00081405Set 9
2021-04-279p2,731w
impeachment material does not
become relevant until after the witness testifies. United States v. Skelos, No. 15-CR-317
(ICMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 (S.D.N.Y ... those
documents would become relevant only after a witness testifies. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538,
at *2. Maxwell's argument that the documents are relevant because their impeachment value ... parte Rule 17(c)
subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if justified. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *8
8
EFTA00081412
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00081405.pdf
EFTA00010118Set 8
2021-11-188p2,432w
Supp. 3d 237, 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted); see United
States v. Skelos, No. 15 Cr. 317, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 ("The materials sought under Rule ... evidence pursuant to Rule 17(c) is not required
until after the witness testifies," Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2, in this case the Government
expects each of the Minor ... defendant, it should only release those records that comply with the Nixon
standard. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 ("To avoid delay in trial, courts sometimes require
production
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010118.pdf
EFTA00103815Set 9
2021-04-279p2,731w
impeachment material does not
become relevant until after the witness testifies. United States v. Skelos, No. 15-CR-317
(ICMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 (S.D.N.Y ... those
documents would become relevant only after a witness testifies. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538,
at *2. Maxwell's argument that the documents are relevant because their impeachment value ... parte Rule 17(c)
subpoenas are possible in some circumstances if justified. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538, at *8
8
EFTA00103822
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103815.pdf
EFTA00020298Set 8
2021-04-279p2,731w
impeachment material does not
become relevant until after the witness testifies. United States v. Skelos, No. 15-CR-317
(ICMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 (S.D.N.Y ... those
documents would become relevant only after a witness testifies. See Skelos, 2018 WL 2254538,
at *2. Maxwell's argument that the documents are relevant because their impeachment value
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020298.pdf
EFTA00018236Set 8
2021-04-0511p3,594w
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 (1974) (footnote omitted); see United States v.
Skelos, 988 F.3d 645, 661 (2d Cir. 2021) (affirming a decision to quash subpoenas through
application ... subpoenas unless a party can justify proceeding ex parte. See United States v. Skelos, No. 15 Cr.
317 (KMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2018) (explaining that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018236.pdf
EFTA00022027Set 8
2021-04-0511p3,484w
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 (1974) (footnote omitted); see United States v.
Skelos, 988 F.3d 645, 661 (2d Cir. 2021) (affirming a decision to quash subpoenas through
application ... subpoenas unless a party can justify proceeding ex parte. See United States v. Skelos, No. 15 Cr.
317 (KMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2018) (explaining that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00022027.pdf
EFTA00077281Set 9
2020-05-066p2,600w
reveals the strategy or direction of a
grand jury investigation. See United States v. Skelos, 2 No. 15 Cr. 317 (KMW)(S.D.N.Y. Oct 20,
2015). Notably, however, Rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077281.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
viii
EFTA00103007
Silver,
15 Cr. 93 (VEC) 275
Skelos,
15 Cr. 317 (KMW) 275
Smith v. Maryland,
442 U.S. 735 (1979) 117, 118
Stogner v. California
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf
EFTA00087736Set 9
2021-10-263p558w
November 16, 2021, the
day that oral voir dire begins. See, e.g., UnitedStates v. Skelos, 15 Cr. 317 (KMW); United States
EFTA00087736
Page 2
v. Kaloyeros
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087736.pdf