EFTA01077101Set 9
61p12,214w
v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,
103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19
Solomon v. State of New York,
146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19
Statutes
14 V.I.C ... that it is evidence "that is
neither equivocal nor open to opposing presumptions." Solomon v. State
of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440 (1st Dep't 1989). Under SORA ... finding that
this element was proven by clear and convincing evidence. See Solomon
v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440 (1st Dep't 1989) (defining
clear and convincing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01077101.pdf
EFTA00181023Set 9
124p12,224w
v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,
103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19
Solomon v. State of New York,
146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19
Statutes
14 V.I.C ... that it is evidence "that is
neither equivocal nor open to opposing presumptions." Solomon v. State
of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440 (1st Dep't 1989). Under SORA ... finding that
this element was proven by clear and convincing evidence. See Solomon
v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440 (1st Dep't 1989) (defining
clear and convincing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00181023.pdf
EFTA00792343Set 9
57p11,385w
v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,
103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19
Solomon v. State of New York,
146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19
Statutes
14 V.I.C ... finding that
this element was proven by clear and convincing evidence. See Solomon
v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440 (1st Dep't 1989) (defining
clear and convincing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792343.pdf
EFTA01074989Set 9
2008-06-3043p8,195w
that it is evidence "that is neither equivocal nor open to opposing
presumptions." Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440, 541
N.Y.S.2d 384 (1st Dept. 1989). Under ... finding that
this element was proven by clear and convincing evidence. See Solomon
v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439, 440, 541 N.Y.S.2d 384 (1st Dept.
1989) (defining clear
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01074989.pdf
EFTA00603264Set 9
2010-08-1657p11,344w
that it is evidence "that is neither equivocal nor open to
opposing presumptions." Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439,
440, 541 N.Y.S.2d 384, 385 (1st Dept
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603264.pdf